Anonymous #1 4w

and have melt downs faster than them too

61

Anonymous #4 4w

there’s a lot of leaked murders but that didn’t stop yall before

61

Anonymous #4 4w

To be fair he did want public executions

52

Anonymous #4 4w

He said gun deaths are worth keeping the second amendment im sure he was happy to die for his cause

33

Anonymous #3 4w

Which one are we making fun off

-3

Anonymous #7 4w

open instagram lmao

6

Anonymous #7 4w

Yes bigot

80

Anonymous #9 4w

U prob don’t even know what a bigot is

-13

Anonymous #4 4w

Yeah!! Death is only funny when we’re able to ignore it!! Dumb piece of shit

1

Anonymous #4 4w

reminder that Charlie Kirk’s assassination is the first and only school shooting right wingers have ever given a shit about

47

Anonymous #7 4w

And you prob secretly like penis

59

Anonymous #7 4w

Are you comparing the “value” of people? If you were at risk of dying without a new organ, would you want the organ donor list to have all the people smarter than you automatically sent in front of you?

21

Anonymous #12 4w

Zinger

-4

Anonymous #7 4w

If you think it’s a choice, you’re probably bi

13

Ur dumb if you think he’s racist. And people “went harder” or whatever because more people knew him and assholes like you make fun of him dying

-5

Anonymous #5 4w

Lawful public executions are different than assassinations and vigilantism. And I don’t think that was a settled belief of his anyway

-4

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 4w

That’s such a strawman. That just shows you can’t argue for your beliefs

-4

Anonymous #7 4w

At least there’s one conservative around here. Hi friend

-4

Anonymous #4 4w

They’re too stupid to see that

-5

Anonymous #4 4w

Preach preach preach

-4

He wasn’t racist lol. I’m black and I know that. He always had facts to back himself up. Just bc you don’t like what he said doesn’t make him wrong

-5

Anonymous #15 4w

He did not have facts. He greatly exaggerated numbers to sound smart. He wasn’t an intelligent philosopher. He WAS racist and thought mlk was a bad person and that the civil rights act was a huge mistake. He frequently dragged down Ketanji Brown Jackson for being on the Supreme Court only because she is black (she graduated Magna cum Laude from Harvard and then got her jd immediately after) Charlie Kirk had zero accolades because he was too dumb of community college and blamed it on black women

15

Anonymous #15 4w

litree said he gets scared when he sees a black pilot and prays they qualified wtfym

9

Anonymous #7 4w

I mean you’re the one who brought men in dresses up unprompted. You obviously have T-girls on the brain and I can’t imagine why 😘

5

Anonymous #13 4w

When did I say it was a choice? Homosexuality is not a choice. It is something you are born with

8

Anonymous #16 4w

Aw boohoo nb gaf

25

Anonymous #17 4w

Why are you like this

-4

Anonymous #7 4w

Just a reminder that if you know any conservatives who say it’s a choice you shouldn’t let it change your opinion of them

-3

Anonymous #13 4w

Wdym

8

Anonymous #16 4w

Quiet piggy

18

Anonymous #4 4w

Quiet piggy

4

Anonymous #7 4w

Quiet piggy

1

Anonymous #16 4w

His death was tragic and the way he died should be condemned. Now that’s not the same as trying to glorify this man’s career and prop the harmful things he’s said up.

14

Anonymous #16 4w

He was evil

8

Anonymous #19 4w

Exactly this, political violence is bad and says bad things about our society. But there’s a reason why when he died, people jumped to “he was a husband and a father” and not any of his actual words. And it suggests something about someone when the nicest thing you can say about them is “well he had relatives”

22

Anonymous #4 4w

I’m sorry, was it not Charlie Kirk himself who said that children getting shot was the natural consequence of having the 2nd Amendment, and that it’s worth children getting shot to keep that right? Like, the man basically called “some gun deaths every year” acceptable losses. He just didn’t expect to be one of them. He meant kindergarteners, not himself, right?

7

Anonymous #4 4w

Like, when you get asked a question about how guns are the leading kid-killer in America for multiple years in a row, and you respond by biting the bullet because you oppose even the most minimal forms of gun regulation, things that would keep the 2A intact and be “time and place regulations” in ConLaw speak, then yeah that’s a tacit admission that you don’t give a shit about those kids. If that’s his position, fine, but I’m not gonna act like him and his audience aren’t shitty people for that.

12

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 4w

Bro just stfu and move along

-3

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 4w

Usually that’s the part that matters to me when I see really distasteful stuff, stuff that could be dug up by people and shoved in the face of the people that he was survived by. But even though I don’t agree with him, I do think it’s important to platform other people’s perspectives and views, and he did just that, he also showed his idiocy through some of that, brave man.

1

Anonymous #13 4w

Why was he racist🤷🏽‍♀️

0

Anonymous #13 4w

No he did not platform other people’s views, not in a genuine way. He clip farmed the most ridiculous examples of people poorly arguing against him, and if you actually managed to win an argument against him or any of his TPUSA surrogates, he’d just edit you out of the final video because he had editorial control over it. He traded in a false marketplace of ideas.

3

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 4w

His whole thing was having an entire staff doing hundreds of hours of debate prep for him to go against people who were typically utterly unprepared, and untrained in how to present themselves on camera, and if you went in with media training and prepped points against him and actually effectively countered him, then he’d just omit your clip because it’s his platform. That’s not the work of an honest interlocutor.

8

Anonymous #13 4w

Disrespectfully, that’s not how this works

7

Anonymous #12 4w

That wasn’t for you, you do realize that right?

0

Anonymous #7 4w

I mean that if you have a conservative friend that is desperately trying to convince themself that it’s a choice, or something similar, that doesn’t make them any less than a conservative who doesn’t need to.

0

Anonymous #7 4w

If they choose to free themselves from stuff that corners them in their own mind, you should also respect that.

0

Anonymous #13 4w

Yeah I can read the number on your reply. That still doesn’t change the fact that you want us to just write off the people who claim that being gay is a choice.

5

Anonymous #12 4w

This is sad, it must be draining being you. I can’t imagine being so negative, nihilistic, and pessimistic all the time, it must be draining to the people around you. In order for society to change you have to hope that it’s possible. I’m not saying you need to change, but don’t try to make your way of thinking the status quo

-1

Anonymous #13 4w

You do realize opinions change right? I’m not gonna condemn someone forever if they say something like that but are also willing to change or discuss their ideas. But saying shit like that is gonna impact my opinion of them. That’s how opinions work you big baby

1

Anonymous #12 4w

I apologize for losing my temper, especially when I didn’t lose it with someone who seems to not believe in universal morality. It just feels like you don’t want him to change, like you would rather laugh at his expense than plant a seed that allows progression.

1

Anonymous #13 4w

I never said any of that dude. If you really want to make changes in the world you can’t jump to conclusions like that

1