Anonymous #1 5w

No. It literally is.

5

Anonymous ___joker__ 5w

It is for those who want to take it as a means to be antisemitic. It’s not for those who are merely concerned with the ultra wealthy controlling institutions globally

1

Anonymous #1 5w

If this is the hill you want to die on lol

1

Anonymous #1 5w

They aren’t even that politically influential anymore. Like they’re rich but in terms of banking they’re far from the dominant group. They’re only focused on, much like George Soros, because they are Jewish.

1

Anonymous #2 5w

Like they’re way way down the list of the most politically important ultra wealthy people. Gee I wonder why they and George Soros are focused on so much relative to other rich families… oh maybe it’s because of the extremely well documented antisemitic origins of that focus

1

Anonymous #2 5w

I get that people with bad intentions use them in that light. The only gripe I have with the family related to their faith is their support of the Zionist movement from like 1890-1960. Like it’s definitely not something worth demonizing anyone over. But it’s definitely something worth looking into and understanding the reality of things imo Soros I thought it was just bc he was left leaning ppl hate him. Him being Jewish does explain some of the hate

1

Anonymous #1 5w

The Soros hate originates with the Russian government and then the Hungarian far-right. It’s because his philanthropic activities were facilitating democratization in Eastern Europe and they didn’t like that.

1

Anonymous #1 5w

Just checked, the central banks claim is fake

6

Anonymous #2 5w

Ayyyyyyyyy #2 delivers

1

Anonymous #2 5w

They don’t own the federal banks youre right, they helped establish them and were highly influential in the 1800s-1900s, not as much now. Now, though, they’re still heavily involved in private wealth management do the ultra rich, and serve as advisory boards for various nations’ merger and acquisitions programs primarily based in London, Paris and Geneva

1

Anonymous #2 5w

But yeah I was wrong, I thought they still had a presence in Africa and SE Asia from the colonial era

1

Anonymous #1 5w

Yes. Rich people do that. But the point is that their modern influence is massively exaggerated to facilitate antisemitic narratives. People aren’t making Twitter copypastas about the Morgans and Mellens and Wallenbergs

1

Anonymous #2 5w

No I agree blindly trusting that Twitter shit is asking to be brainwashed/wrong. I’m just saying that the fact they are used as a dog whistle by those groups doesn’t mean that they’re actually all pure and good. They’re still heavily influential in the world of big money and big business, at least in Europe

1

Anonymous #1 5w

Yea rich dynasties are bad. It’s just that usually this one particular rich family is being brought up for the wrong reason.

1