Anonymous #2 1d

Why?

-1

Anonymous #5 1d

He’s a 4chan loser who claims he’s an “ultimate gamer”, bought Twitter specifically to bitch and moan about everything and have everyone see it, and builds spaceships and cars that do nothing useful besides exploding. He’s Great Value Tony Stark at best

6

Anonymous #5 1d

He’s an idiot when it comes to designing cars and running a tech company lmao

1

Anonymous #3 1d

Which is stupid because they use stocks as collateral

2

Anonymous evil_sheep 1d

I agree

5

Anonymous #6 1d

it’s not called tw*tter its called X now.

-1

Anonymous #3 1d

Tax unrealized gains Yes it’s not perfect. There may be issues if someone has like a family painting that goes up in value. That doesn’t mean we can’t at least try starting with the richest and most corrupt people lol

3

Anonymous #5 1d

Calm down man twitter ain’t gonna hurt you now

1

Anonymous #4 1d

I think the point is that a person can easily live comfortably for the rest of their life with a billion, going beyond that is greedy and excessive.

5

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1d

Is it your belief that the government should take any wealth past the point of living comfortably?

1

Anonymous #4 1d

Well, kinda? I moreso think along the lines that the government should be proactive rather than reactive. There’s no moral way to become a billionaire, really. So it should be next to impossible to accrue that much money in general.

4

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1d

Why do you believe theres no moral way you become a billionaire? Do you believe that wealth cannot be created?

1