Anonymous #1 13w

trump pulled out of the nuclear deal his first term. yes, biden should have tried more to get it to be a thing again, but if trump idk never pulled out of it in the first place?

9

Anonymous #2 13w

i’m not mad about that? i just think it’s funny how trump doesn’t realize/understand anything he does to the full extent. ya, they’re gonna threaten, him thinking it’ll be chill is dumb

2

Anonymous #1 13w

Iran hasn’t initiated of escalated a conflict in the last 300 years. Israel has 5 times in the last year. The existence of WMDS being developed in Iran has 0 PROOF and negotiations regarding development were going to happen right before Trump unilaterally withdrew. This exact same thing happened with Iraq in 2005. This is a completely unnecessary escalation that was already being figured out diplomatic until his dumbass figured it’s more important that we start a war and aim for a regime change.

14

Anonymous #3 13w

i’m aware of the will and want for a regime change and endless war Isreal is trying to pull America into, but what you aren’t understanding they did have nuclear weapons plants, and they did make threats against us and our allies? Trump sees this, and said we aren’t fighting a war for Israel. We have the bunker buster bombs, they don’t. We went in, took care of a potential threat and got out? I’m still not understanding why this is bad?

0

Anonymous #1 13w

1. Once again, there is ZERO evidence that weapons were being developed. All information gathered has indicated they were nuclear ENERGY plants. 2. Even on the chance that Iran was developing weapons, the whole point of having nuclear weapons is literally not to use them. Every country that has nukes uses them as a deterrent because almost every country is at least smart enough to not engulf the planet in war. If Trump really cared about denuclearization he would have remained in any of the

9

Anonymous #3 13w

programs with those supposed objectives he’s claiming on operating under. Why do you think nobody has gone for Pakistan like they have Iraq and Iran? They were lucky enough to start a nuclear weapons program early enough and under the radar enough that they are now capable of defending themselves. They don’t use them as anything other than a deterrent.

8

Anonymous #1 13w

idk how about have a fucking conversation about rejoining the deal without being a dickhead like he has been to every other foreign leader instead of acting like he has a big dick and bomb them. “women are too emotional to lead” but women typically tend to have conversations first

11

Anonymous #3 13w

Claiming nukes are “just deterrents” doesn’t hold in a region where proxy wars are LITERALLY the norm. A nuclear-armed Iran would boost its support for terrorist organizations and increase the risk of a regional arms race or worse escalation. Deterrence only works with stable & rational leaders and the iranian regime isn’t that.

-1

Anonymous OP 13w

the deal had clauses that would eventually let iran resume nuclear activities, ignored Iran’s ballistic missile development and regional terrorism, and allowed weak inspections with delayed access to sensitive sites. stop acting like you know stuff when you don’t lil bro. the deal was terrible and made no sense to stay apart of.

-1

Anonymous #1 13w

hmmmmm I wonder why wars are the norm in the Middle East I wonder which global superpower’s self interest could have been the reason all of those wars were caused……..

7

Anonymous #3 13w

why does america need to reason in wars we are not apart of? why does america need to reason with countries who are against us and are not our allies?

0

Anonymous #1 13w

the crazy thing about deals is that they can change and be negotiated. I know, unbelievable and crazy to imagine, but speaking to people and making compromises and working together to have a better outcome for both countries? now THAT is power and strength. not using a bomb

3

now you want to talk about negotiations?? we gave Iran 60 days to negotiate something and they didn’t.

-1

Anonymous #1 13w

yes, let’s give them two months to figure out everything that they want. it’s a fucking country. you know how long things take in our OWN country? 60 days is petty as hell.

3

Anonymous #1 13w

finding middle ground between the middle east and the usa… in 60 days… the middle east… and the usa… middle ground… yes yes it is very easy to find that and start a plan yes yes my bad, I thought we were talking about the usa and denmark finding middle ground like that’s hard as FUUUUCKKKKK

3

Anonymous OP 13w

dude, negotiations don’t have to mean a done deal, say all be all, we’re on the same page. maybe a start would be “we both don’t want war”????? Trump came to the table, they didn’t. the EU and American intelligence said there was a potential threat. we waited another week, they AGAIN didn’t show up. so we hit a spot with bunker busters to wipe a potential threat. what are you arguing dude. this was far from a bad move

0

Anonymous OP 13w

i dont understand what you’re trying to argue, we literally prevented WW3. Like i said before there was a reason Russia backed out of their deal with Iran right after we hit the sites. stop the crap please

0

Anonymous #1 13w

If you don’t understand that escalating a conflict with a major regional power who have several superpower alliances, which could trigger potential treaty obligations, increasing the risk of global economic catastrophe if Iran now shuts down the Strait of Hormuz, is only going to cause so many more problems for us, as opposed to diplomatic plans that we chose to step out of and strongarm instead, then I don’t know what to tell you.

1

Anonymous #1 13w

there were better ways to go about it, that’s what im saying. “resolving” things with bombs isn’t and shouldn’t be the only way we handle things because its not gonna help. idc if they may be incapable of doing stuff or wouldn’t do things because we would destroy them. 60 days isn’t enough for an entire country to come together and figure out how to speak to the country that has been absolutely horrific to them for years and years and years. whatever intel they have I genuinely also believe

3

Anonymous #1 13w

it’s bullshit because they never tell us/reveal the real truth. this admin will always lie

3

Anonymous OP 13w

….but the last admin just sent billions over seas and did nothing to try and stop anything. get a grip you shill

0

Anonymous #1 13w

holy whataboutism, nobody said anything about the last administration you muppet

2

Anonymous #1 13w

when the fuck did I say I agreed with that lmfao

3

Anonymous #3 13w

did you just delete your comment and recomment😭😭😭😭😭😭

0

Anonymous #1 13w

ya because I made a spelling mistake lol I said “whe the fuck” and not “when” 😬

1

Anonymous #1 13w

go eat your crayons

3

Anonymous #1 13w

Netanyahu has literally been saying Iran is “months” away from having nukes since the 90s lmao. Why does anyone believe anything that monsters says (i know why…)

1

Anonymous #4 13w

Why can everyone have nukes as a defensive threat except Iran who was needlessly aggressed by Israel on the basis of “we think you might have nukes maybe and we’ve thought this for the last 35 years lol”

1

Anonymous #4 13w

Why can Israel be the main regional aggressor but when Iran hits back its a big deal 🙄

1

Anonymous #4 13w

I get your points so much lol I don’t think anyone should have nuclear weapons in my opinion, but they’re gonna have them regardless of what I want. I think their thinking is Iran is unpredictable, but I feel like we lowkey made them this way from what I have read (will admit I should research more!) everyone is so scared that everyone has nuclear because they know the moment someone uses one, everyone will nuke everyone and everyone will die, so why the fuck do we even have them LOL

1