Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
US Politics icon
US Politics 14h
Banning affirmative action makes sense: it’s unconstitutional race based discrimination Also agree with overturning Roe v. Wade: the right to privacy doesn’t apply to abortion and “substantive due process” is questionable
US Politics icon
US Politics 14h
We gonna talk about how Clarence Thomas consistently wants to overturn gay marriage?
comment

6
upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 14h

I’ve determined you have no right to privacy when you buy your fifth pocket pussy this month

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 14h

I have a long term gf

upvote -3 downvote
🍃
Anonymous replying to -> OP 14h

Does she know you don’t support her right to her own body?

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> stoner22 14h

I support her right to her own body, including access to abortion. I just agree with the legal reasoning to overturn Roe v. Wade. And yes, she knows I’m pro choice.

upvote 0 downvote
🍃
Anonymous replying to -> OP 14h

Pro choice but agree with the overturning of national precedent protecting her right to a choice because you agree with some fancy wording? Bro…

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> stoner22 14h

No, not “some fancy wording.” I fundamentally don’t agree the right to privacy protects the right to abortion. I also don’t agree with the substantive due process reasoning whereby precious justices interpreted that the Constitution implies a right to abortion. The Constitution does NOT guarantee a right to abortion. And Supreme Court Justices should not be “interpreting” the Constitution in such a broad way.

upvote 0 downvote