Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Ai uses 265 Billion gallons of water per year. All livestock globally take up 1.15 Quadrillion Gallons. Thats about 55% of water for agriculture, but only 16% of global calories. If Ai water use is really that big of a problem to you, go vegan.
upvote -8 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 10w

So you do realize there’s objectively more livestock than data centers so no shit it uses more? Additionally, that is something that directly benefits humanity because it gives us protein in a stable source of food. Water from farms can be treated and used again, water from data centers cannot.

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 10w

Cherry picking numbers again! And trying to very poorly use logical fallacies to try and make a point. What source do you have for livestock and how much they use? Or is that what ai told you?

upvote 11 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous 10w

Hey so…funny thing is…we NEED livestock for food, clothing, and other things that we need right….we don’t need AI. Hope this helps

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 10w

Thats why I included its calorie ratio

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 10w

you realize that CAFOs (concentrated animal farming operations) have already been criticized by freshwater conservationists for decades… right? we don’t like massive CAFOs. nobody does. FUCK SMITHFIELD. 1 in 4 pigs are from Smithfield and they are trying to lobby in Congress to sneak into a bill (Save Our Bacon Act or some shit) that’d make that ratio even worse… nevertheless. this is a great example of a false equivalence.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 10w

Exactly, what im saying is that people who care, like those water conservationists I can understand, but the people who only care now that its ai are hypocrites

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> themind._.ofhueyfreeman25 10w

We dont though, livestock is vastly more inefficient than plants. If we replaced those 16% of calories with plants we would cut agricultural water usage by 47%, down to only 53% of what it currently is. Thats nearly 1 Quadrillion Gallons in a single year, equal to 3400 Years of AI usage at our current rate. So if we just stopped for a single year, we could offset AI ise for basically as long as developed civilization has been around.

upvote 1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 10w

Even still, livestock is objectively more important and useful than AI. Trying to compare the livestock industry to AI is like comparing goats to sheep

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 10w

uh… no i would say they are correct because it is damaging MORE than just the ecosystems that they’re destroying. it’s like exponentially more than just freshwater ecosystems being impacted, actually. people don’t care much about CAFOs because freshwater & animal welfare are the only TWO things that it really impacts directly.

upvote 3 downvote