Anonymous dawn_puzzlepiece 9w

if cultural genocide is our “rule of law” then we’re the furthest thing from civil. plus calling us civil in the first place when we bomb other countries and commit genocides for profit is insane cognitive dissonance

6

Anonymous #2 9w

who is coming here to erase the culture. explain.

2

Anonymous OP 9w

If the same ideology and interconnected people who are running Europe are killing it, they will begin here.

-1

Anonymous #2 9w

who is running europe and killing it.

4

Anonymous OP 9w

EU left-wing ideologies

0

Anonymous #2 9w

…right. and who exactly does that encompass and how is it “killing it”

3

Anonymous OP 9w

anyone favoring say for example UK Labour Party procedures, anything in relation to the erasure of cultural identity by either governmental suppression or the onset of uncooperative Islamic nationals.

-1

Anonymous #2 9w

there it is. the right wing islamophobia.

6

Anonymous dawn_puzzlepiece 9w

The rule of law we have to uphold says people have the right to practice their cultural practices and religions without judgement and harm. The rule of law in the United States is called the Constitution

6

Anonymous #2 9w

Bro just discovered that the problem isn’t religion, it’s right-wing extremism 💀💀💀

2

Anonymous #2 9w

Wait let me get this straight: Islamic citizens in Europe don’t want to assimilate (e.i. Lose their cultural and religious practices) so therefor European culture is being erased simply because they want to be left alone? Make it make sense without being a stupid fucking right wing moron who hates anyone who’s brown

2

Anonymous #2 9w

The more left-leaning euro countries have us beat on citizen happiness year over year. What are you waffling about

9

Anonymous #4 9w

Really? How many people in UK are happy with the dog that just got beaten to death by an Islamic national? Or the people who have been raped and/or killed simply for not being the right color and the wrong religion? Should they be happy?

-1

Anonymous #3 9w

I hate people who rape and kill on the basis of skin color and religion, or who are favorable and complicit with it. I especially despise governments which say nothing and do nothing while creating more problems and suppressing their own native population. You just want to see non-coloureds suffer. You are all about skin color, that’s why your version of love and hate whether it be on you or someone else likes me must be on the basis of color in your mind.

0

Anonymous #2 9w

Not all Muslims are bad, but the religion allows for that behavior, jihad, etcetera, and the cultural and identity crisis requires radical change and resolutions of sober minds to reduce.

0

Anonymous #3 9w

Also, not sure if you were aware, but you don’t have to be “brown” (why not just say African or Middle Eastern instead of reducing people to colors?) to be Muslim. You definitely have to be raised in certain regions that promote the more heinous behaviors and worldviews on other people different from you to be most likely part of the issue.

-1

Anonymous #2 9w

“Not all Christians are bad, but the religion allows for that behavior, kkk, etc. and the cultural and identity crisis requires radical change and resolutions of sober minds to reduce.” Again, you can say this about ANY religion. Christians held an inquisition for about 300 years and forced Jews and Muslims to convert or die.

3

Anonymous #2 9w

“Oh yeah? There’s violent crime in the world, libtard! Checkmate 😎”

1

Anonymous #3 9w

No not really. At least in the Christian case that would be frowned upon actually and a corrupt misuse of the religion, whereas Islam itself is a religion that promotes violence and is thus retaining the onus of the violence it allows

0

Anonymous #3 9w

You clearly don’t know what jihad is in relationship to Islam. I’ll let you do your own research is, because jihad isn’t a racist organization formed by a Confederate loser

0

Anonymous #2 9w

Jihad just means struggle bro. That’s literally it. There is mortal struggles like temptation and there’s physical struggles like war and justice. What does this have to do with what I said? the struggle ISIS talks about is not supported by Muslims around the world. My point is you’re clearly throwing all Muslims in the same box, but not throwing Christians in the same box. The point is: religions are neither violent nor non-violent. If you’re a violent person, then your practice will be as well

1

Anonymous #2 9w

Yeah cuz the Bible doesn’t also promote violence. Like in Deuteronomy when god tells the Israelites to destroys every city that does not believe in him, or when god himself destroys the world with a flood, or in my all time favorite passage Psalms 137:9 when they say it’s okay to slam children against rocks to kill them 🙄🙄 might I remind you Christianity and Islam have more in common than either of them have with Judaism

3

Anonymous #3 9w

No no. You can put jihad on countries or people if they don’t follow Islam and are not complicit in its acceptance. The whole concept is about control and conquer. All about infidels. Thats why the captive native British girls were often and still are dehumanized and called kafar.

-1

Anonymous #2 9w

Also I literally just said not all Muslims. So I’m not putting them all in a box. I am putting the religion in criticism and those who follow it to such fullness as to create the issues of the day.

1

Anonymous #2 9w

Your point of non-violence is fair. And it shows especially for those regions where heinous actions are permitted, such as Pakistan. Again, doesn’t conflict with me, because I did not say all Muslims. But if the religion does call to action forms of physical or territorial violence, it would follow that perhaps it is not a neutral religion

1

Anonymous #2 9w

"kafir" is an Arabic term meaning "disbeliever," it’s not a blanket term to dehumanize people. Some extremists misuse the term, but that doesn't make it representative of Islam as a whole. It's important to distinguish between the actions of individuals or extremists and the beliefs of a religion followed by like two billion people. Whether intentional or not your STILL generalizing to all Muslims

1

Anonymous #2 9w

I mean historically I’d argue Christianity is responsible for more problems but whatever man keep thinking muslims are violent marauders

1

Anonymous #3 9w

And? Where does it say to do that to everyone? Where is the part that it becomes a principal to follow, and not a command for the war or the context of that moment in time. Also, your verse is literally so out of context. Psalm is literally a poem. Children generally refer to generations, and in this case the lament of the psalmist for the injustice by the Babylonians.

1

Anonymous #3 9w

Literally not

1

Anonymous #2 9w

Btw not getting over the fact that in response to me pointing out the KKK (terrorist group btw) you subtly removed the Christianity from their ideology

1

Anonymous #3 9w

A religion can only be at fault if it directly permits the actions of the people who cause the problems.

1