Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download

🎏
Anonymous 2d

Misogyny isn’t ok even when used against people you don’t like

upvote -6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 2d

Counterpoint; it’s Erika Kirk.

upvote 75 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 2d

Have you considered that it’s funny and Erika Kirk isn’t really a person?

upvote 52 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 2d

Also, it’s not misogyny, the post explicitly says he DOESNT agree with Kirk. He just understands we’re Charlie was coming from being married to Erika lmao.

upvote 55 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2d

She’s done a very bad acting job in the character “human woman”

upvote 24 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2d

“I don’t agree with misogyny, but *misogyny*” you are all probably men too

upvote -9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 2d

“Lefties”: NO YOU CANT BE MEAN TO THE EVIL DEMON PEOPLE THAT OPPOSE US AND WANT TO KILL US THATS NOT WOKE!

upvote 16 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2d

Why do you have to lie? I never said you can’t be mean. I said misogyny isn’t okay

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 2d

Get off your high horse and let us gloat in the tongue of the adversary

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 2d

Are you intentionally missing the point of the joke or is it autism /gen Because the punchline is that misogyny is still bad, but Erika should stay at home because she’s a grifting prick profiting off her husband’s death

upvote 11 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2d

Misogyny against women you don’t like enforces misogyny against women you do like. Still waiting for a reply

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 2d

It’s not misogyny, it’s just hating a vile person. The posy literally excludes the possibility of misogyny

post
upvote 5 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2d

So you can say any misogynistic thing you want as long as you say “I’m not misogynistic”? Makes no sense

upvote 4 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2d

You’re just jumping through hoops to justify misogyny because of your bias against the woman it’s targeting

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 2d

my friend, i think your interpretation is slightly off. i understood this was more of a joke about the personal dynamic between the Kirks & their marriage; CK’s misogyny was also rooted in EK’s own misogynistic rhetoric, but also that he was embarrassed by her & just didn’t want her out in public anyway bc she’s not good at speaking or being human. 😅

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 1d

Lemme spell it out for you, “All women should stay at home” = misogyny “THIS particular woman should stay at home because she as a distinct individual is evil and should not partake in society” = NOT misogyny

upvote 7 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1d

Lemme spell it out for you: “This woman should stay at home” is misogyny

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 1d

Okay so let’s say there is a woman who happens to be a severe pyromaniac. There’s a big weed festival going on tonight, and you happen to see her there. Would it better if this woman: A) kept on attending the festival or B) Stayed at home

upvote 6 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1d

You’re jumping through hoops instead of taking accountability for the misogyny. Just like I told someone else, when you say “this particular woman I won’t like should stay at home”, it’s misogynistic which reinforces negative stereotypes for all women. You know you can express you don’t like her without making a misogynistic joke, right? You don’t have to double down.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 1d

You’re jumping through hoops to be offended. Literally that one friend who’s too woke

upvote 1 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1d

“So you can say any misogynistic thing you want and it’s okay because you said “I’m not misogynistic”” You haven’t replied to this yet

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 1d

I mean you’re not wrong, but we’re talking about conservative women here. They are the ones actively prescribing misogyny and women’s domesticity the most. If they aren’t gonna practice what they preach, then we should be able to call them out for hypocrisy. Maybe it would be offensive to tell them to get back in the kitchen, but isn’t that the whole point? If they themselves are living proof that (prescribed) women’s domesticity is a total joke, then why NOT emphasize that point?

upvote 7 downvote
🎏
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1d

Yes, like I’ve been saying, you think misogyny is okay if it’s against conservative women (somehow??). But you don’t care that it enforces misogyny against all women

upvote -1 downvote
🎏
Anonymous 11h

You can’t get to pick and choose who it “only applies” to. Stop jumping through hoops to justify misogyny

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> landtrust 7h
post
upvote 1 downvote