Anonymous #1 2w

I completely agree with that and I do think it still hurt her with key demographics. I just don’t think it was the issue that sunk the campaign.

4

Anonymous #2 2w

The economy/inflation is based off what I’ve seen consistently been the #1 issue across the states and was the issue that led so many suburbanites (especially suburban women) to vote Trump.

6

Anonymous #3 2w

nah, we need to move on

-1

Anonymous #4 2w

How does one move on without meaningfully assessing their previous mistakes?

10

Anonymous #4 2w

Ah yes, move on without learning a single lesson about why we lost so badly

5

Anonymous #1 2w

they have, thats the point of the study. that doesnt mean it needs to be released publicly

-1

Anonymous #3 2w

strange rewrite of 2024. dems didnt lose “so badly”

-1

Anonymous #4 2w

If they had they would release it, that’s the whole point. Many voters were tired of the lack of transparency, so to refuse to be transparent is… not a good look

5

Anonymous #4 2w

They lost every swing state. That’s pretty bad. Can I have whatever you’re huffing?

10

Anonymous #1 2w

no, the whole point is to give candidates the guidance to win elections. that doesnt necessarily involve releasing it publicly

-1

Anonymous #4 2w

So just a handful of DNC elites actually know the results and they just expect democratic candidates and voters to just go along with “trust us, we know what’s best even though we lost so thoroughly last time” instead of being able to come to their own conclusions?

6

Anonymous #4 2w

What if someone from the public decided to run? Are they just simply not allowed to access that knowledge?

6

Anonymous #1 2w

youre not considering the circumstances of the race. the deck was incredibly stacked against kamala, who only had 100 days to run a campaign

-1

Anonymous #4 2w

Refusing to be transparent does not inspire trust from voters.

6

Anonymous #3 2w

uh yes, thats the whole point of doing the study in the first place. this also totally misses the fact that countless studies have been done abt 2024 publicly. we know the dynamics of the outcome

-1

Anonymous #1 2w

they summarize the guidance in the playbook on their website, you can go look at it

-1

Anonymous #4 2w

If the public studies were the same as the one conducted by the democrats, why are they being so tight-lipped about releasing their findings?

6

Anonymous #1 2w

the point of the study is to create workable guidance for candidates, not to continue the endless litigation of 2024

-1

Anonymous #4 2w

Where are you getting the “continue the endless litigation of 2024” outcome from? How can anyone predict what would happen from the autopsy being released?

3

Anonymous #4 2w

Once again, why trust the DNC to come up with “workable guidance” instead of letting candidates and voters come to their own conclusions. The DNC is not exactly trustworthy at this point, and this decision does nothing to help

3

Anonymous #1 2w

no matter what the report actually says, the far left will cling to anything to sow division in the party, this is obvious to anyone paying attention

-2

Anonymous #3 2w

because the point of the organization is to actually organize. and letting statistically illiterate people glom onto whatever conclusion confirms their biases is not unifying, its the exact opposite actually

-1

Anonymous #4 2w

Ah yes because you totally have a magic ball that tells you the future exactly how it will play out. The far left was going to do that anyways, and now that have even more of a reason to criticize the DNC. Foot, meet mouth.

5

Anonymous #1 2w

it doesnt take a magic ball to know the people who rabidly hate the dnc will take any opportunity to do this lmao

-1

Anonymous #4 2w

So instead of just releasing their findings after announcing they would, the DNC gave critics an even better reason to despise them. Nice going!

2

Anonymous #1 2w

yeah, they dont want to give the far left more ammunition to divide the party. its really that simple

-2

Anonymous #4 2w

They just did tho

2

Anonymous #1 2w

yeah but this will get lost in the news cycle within days

-2

Anonymous #4 2w

So now the far left can spread rumors about why Dems lost instead of having actual data to support any claims. Really just sounds like the DNC doesn’t like what they found

6

Anonymous #4 2w

So it’s about saving face instead of having actionable facts to work on

4

Anonymous #3 2w

regardless they will say its israel palestine, liz cheney, lethal military, etc etc. whatever the report says will not change that

-1

Anonymous #4 2w

What a pathetic answer

5

Anonymous #1 2w

whatever u say man

-1

Anonymous #4 2w

I mean for what it’s worth we know for a fact more Bernie supporters in 2016 voted for Hillary than Hillary supporters voted for Obama in 2008 yet it doesn’t stop the center of the party from blaming Bernie supporters for Hillary’s loss in 2016. you’re kind of pulling a pot calling the kettle black rn.

9

Anonymous #4 2w

You can’t respond to the point

3

Anonymous OP 2w

i could not care less what happened in a dem primary from 10 years ago

-2

Anonymous #4 2w

Not shocked that you don’t care because apparently you don’t even care about what happened in a general election that just happened. Nevertheless all you’re showing is the point just flew straight over your head.

11

Anonymous OP 2w

i do care, the report is a red herring to shit on the dnc. theres plenty of studies we can look at right now to determine what happened. no ones interested in doing that though

-2

Anonymous #4 2w

Saying we need to move on from an absolute disaster of an election against a deranged Donald Trump doesn’t signal that you care. And you’re right there are plenty of studies but the most definitive thing that could put it to bed would be the autopsy and would be a win for transparency which yes I think we’re owed. My problem with ppl like you is you care more about protecting the team then fixing the root issues that’s holding the team back. You’d rather look good than actually be good.

7

Anonymous #4 2w

The DNC spent huge amounts of time and money to create a report that’s a red herring to shit on the DNC? If that were true, it’s even more of a reason not to trust their prescribed guidance

6

Anonymous #3 2w

ive said like 5 times what the purpose of the report is, im saying the insistence on the report by the far left media is a red herring because we can just look at the data thats already out there. they just want to shit on the dnc

-1

Anonymous #4 2w

The report is completely meaningless without the data used to back up its claims. Might as well be pulled out of the DNC’s ass

1