Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Calif. loses mind-boggling $1 trillion in wealth in past month alone over fears of ‘Billionaire Tax’
upvote 6 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

The only source I can find for your claim is Fox, but here’s something from a reliable financial source.

post
upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

Won’t somebody think of the shareholders?

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

Well California is a hellhole

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 4w

When people have retirement funds 😡

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

Who has retirement funds of $1 billion or more?

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

Just responding to #1, because its a bad line. Most people who own stock are just trying to retire.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

Is the retroactive application constitutional?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

This tax applies to people with a net worth of $1 billion or greater, which exceeds almost all retirement portfolios

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

Absolutely nobody that needs their wealth redistributed is having retirement funds in excess of $1 billion. Even if they did, that shit deserves to get taxed because people on our streets are dying from lack of food and water while the rich burn down forests for another cent to their bottom line

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 4w

People are not dying on the streets from lack of food and water. We have data on this. Less than 30 Americans die every year from lack of food. All of these are cases of criminal abuse of neglect, not people starving on the street.

post
upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

Look me in the eyes and tell me right now there isn’t a mass crisis of people being unable to meet their basic needs. I genuinely dare you

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 4w

A crisis implies that theres a sudden spike. Yes, there are Americans who are unable to meet their needs but A.) they’re not starving to death on the streets like you claimed and B.) we are better at meeting the needs of everyone than almost any society in the history of the world.

upvote -1 downvote