Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
US Politics icon
US Politics 1w
Finally a win for women
9 upvotes, 10 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "Finally a win for women"
comment

10
upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Isn’t this no different than the case 10+ years ago about the baker who didn’t want to make a cake for a gay wedding

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Btw you know this isn’t really a win, right? The court declined to hear the case. This judge dissented. They weren’t in the majority

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

No women should be barred from women-only spaces, regardless of which gender they were assigned at birth. This is hardly a “win”

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

Yup. That’s comparable precedent

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

4th and 5th paragraphs give AI vibes for some reason lmao

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

Agreed

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

Are you dumb?

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Are you transphobic?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

Look at the way the lower court ruled. This action solidified the win.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

This is a dissent. The other two upheld the lower court’s ruling that the *law* doesn’t violate the first amendment (which I’m a bit confused about)

post
upvote 1 downvote