Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Would you support a Homeless Enforcement Squadron (HES) to remove encampments, remove homeless from public places including train stations, restrooms and relocate them to institutions & halfway houses for reorientation to regular society?
#poll
Yes
No
Something in the middle (explain)
117 votes
upvote 5 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 6d

Homelessness isn’t just about not having a home. When you go to get a job, they’ll ask you for ID, need an address/bank account to send checks to, to have a home address you’ll need deposit, proof of employment, good credit score, to get a bank account you need a SSN/ID, deposit/minimum balance, it’s a circle. It’s not a problem of systemic barriers to entry, paired with exasperated issues like addiction, mental health issues. We already do not have enough homeless shelters for homeless people.

upvote 22 downvote
🦧
Anonymous 6d

moron move when the owners plan on replacing you with ai

upvote 13 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous 6d

Yeah because sending a 3-letter agency to round up undesirables in the US never ever goes wrong 🙄

upvote 10 downvote
🍑
Anonymous 6d

I think housing should be universal lol

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6d

No, forcible relocation is not the answer

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6d

Id support my tax dollars going to helping homeless folks get back on track instead of my money going to murdering brown kids.

upvote 3 downvote
🚮
Anonymous 6d

yes, but only if the institutions are properly funded and overseen

upvote 1 downvote
🦧
Anonymous replying to -> _orangutan 6d

ban speculation on housing, and implement housing first initiatives. not whatever fascist bullshit you morons come up with

upvote 9 downvote
🦧
Anonymous replying to -> _orangutan 6d

a solution to the housing crisis. bulldoze the playgrounds for well to do whites (golf courses and country clubs) and build dense affordable housing in their place

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> _orangutan 6d

Agreed with banning speculation on housing & housing first initiatives! Though I do like golf and the country club. A compromise can be reached!

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6d

Vice has a good documentary detailing some of these issues, it’s called “Shelter”

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6d

But they also need to be reeducated. A lot of them have no sense of decorum or social cohesion.

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6d

How are you supposed to have a sense of “social cohesion” when you are pushed out of the community you live in and ignored by the state/nation you are a citizen of? How are you supposed to have decorum without the opportunity to feel clean, fed, supported, and secure? It’s not about “reeducating” people, it’s about providing them the support and opportunity to learn and practice. Homeless people aren’t Tarzan. They are in constant fight-or-flight

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6d

Well why were they pushed out? How did they lose all this? I understand some are down on their luck but many have serious mental illness and need to be institutionalized. Others merely need state-built housing.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6d

It’s in the name, you lack a “home.” Many of them lack a feeling of safety, being seen/respected by others, and a guarantee of food, warmth, good hygiene, enrichment, and opportunity. Nobody wakes up and chooses to be homeless (unless it’s escaping a dangerous situation), the stress of instability, lack of peace or protection, and a lack of community exasperates the cycle of homelessness

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6d

so you don’t give a fuck about homeless people, you just want to institutionalize them to not have to see them?

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 6d

There are those who need to be institutionalized and others who merely need free housing. I care for them in that I am disgusted by poverty & mental illness and wish for no one to experience it.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6d

institutionalization will not help anyone for being homeless, if you want to provide mental health services then it must be on a voluntary program, otherwise you’re only recreating our old problem of over institutionalization and the subsequent issues that accompany that (like abuse of patients) Provide housing first, and you’ll be surprised how many issues being resolving themselves.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 6d

(I’m not talking about shelters either, I’m talking provide actual houses or apartments to people facing or living in homelessness)

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 6d

You do not ask a drowning man if he consents to be not drowning. You just save him. Sometimes people are incapable of making their own choices. Ex. 2024 reelection of the orange clown. The people are too stupid to decide

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 6d

You’re preaching to the choir. Free housing ought to be the norm.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6d

you’re acting as if the state, the same state who created the conditions for homelessness and wage slavery, would actually give a fuck? We have historical precedent to understand that mass institutionalization campaigns are not for the benefit of the people they’re targeting, but for the benefit of others to not have to think about or deal with them. In your scenario, providing a free house is the equivalent of a life raft/pulling them out of the water. I view institutionalization as the

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 6d

equivalent to imprisoning the man for drowning in the first place lol

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 6d

You think too small young proletariat. Indeed your world view and vision is too limited and only thinks in fiscal quarters instead of decades. Fear not young one for change will eventually come

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6d

Or maybe, you’ve adopted too much of capitalist sentiment.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6d

We can’t meaningfully change things while reimplementing and reinforcing the exact frameworks that were weaponized against countless people, but especially anti-capitalists and marginalized demographics

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 6d

I’m more of a Technocrat (In the traditional non tech bro way)

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6d

so you’re just picking and choosing differently ideological beliefs that you don’t actually agree with, in order to subtly spread your own ideology?

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 6d

I just want clean streets, no more loud people and a good space program

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6d

maybe let’s focus on ridding the streets of fascists yk? I promise that’s a much more meaningful first step than subtly criminalizing homelessness.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 6d

bc even if you got every homeless person out off the streets, we still have to deal with the plague that is white supremacy and the various fascist subgroups fighting for power.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 6d

They must be gotten rid of! Trump and his bad of corrupt pedos must be dealt with and brought to justice

upvote 1 downvote