Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Do you think that innocent before proven guilty shouldn’t apply in college SA cases, even given the Duke Lacrosse scandal and situations like Emmett Till’s which disproportionately impact black and brown men?
upvote 7 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 14h

Uh no? What’s to stop a bitter ex from accusing you of rape, and then you have to somehow prove you didn’t do it?

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 14h

Depends on the scenario. If a phone call is received that a girl is being raped in a frat house and the police come in and find a girl naked and drunk and boys around her, they should immediately try to prove innocence over proving guilt. If they know a frat/sports team is commonly involved in SA allegations they should take that as guilt. But if it’s as little as Emmett till, no, a catcall or ass grab isn’t the same as penetrative/exploitive violent acts of sexual violence.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 14h

Claiming that a team is commonly involved in allegations and taking that as guilt is not innocent against proven guilty… people can easily spread rumors, that’s literally what happened in the Duke lacrosse case

upvote 8 downvote