Anonymous #1 9w

Wdym

1

Anonymous #2 9w

He’s doing a good job for sure. NC seems to always elect pretty solid governors.

1

Anonymous OP 9w

The funny thing is it could be PA or NC and your point would still stand 😂

1

Anonymous #3 9w

Hahaha true I love them both

1

Anonymous #3 9w

I just inherently assume NC because it’s so close to me. I live in GA

1

Anonymous #4 9w

I don’t think that supporting an increase in police funding is inherently bad, especially from the lens of him having governed over the whole Aurora situation. I could care less about his opinion of a foreign country, as it has zero impact on his ability to govern Colorado. Data centers are my main critique of him and why he isn’t a darker shade of green on this map, along with the election clerk thing—my two biggest critiques of him for sure.

1

Anonymous OP 9w

Thanks for not prioritizing Israel when it comes to opinions on non-foreign policy-facing offices

10

Anonymous #3 9w

It’s just entirely irrelevant. What does the governor of Colorado have to do with a country 9,000 miles away?!? He could be the most outspoken critic of Israel on Earth and it would change quite literally nothing. He has no national power, and he has no international power—he only has power in Colorado, which has zilch to do with Israel. People have grown too accustomed with dragging the Israel debate into areas where it has no relevance, and gubernatorial races are one of those areas.

1

Anonymous OP 9w

He virtually blocked a bill that would have limited law enforcement’s use of flock cameras. He’s pro surveillance state. That stems directly from his toes and super if Israel

1

Anonymous #4 9w

Okay I didn’t know that, that is terrible and absolutely lowers my opinion of him. Flock has nothing to do with Israel though, they are based out of my hometown, Atlanta. Just because some of their people are Jewish does not equate to being a dependent of Israel from a corp. perspective.

1