Anonymous #1 17w

there is no such thing as a hereditary “top 1%”.

9

Anonymous #1 17w

Tf you mean both

10

Anonymous #1 17w

Fence sitter we got a fence sitter! 🫵

10

Anonymous just_a_bucket 17w

I don’t think he’s a fence sitter I think he’s a Nazi. Bro actually thinks a hereditary top 1% exists

10

Anonymous #2 17w

Dehumanizing rich people is bad, and so is eugenics

1

Anonymous #1 17w

Oh well that’s a bit different. We’re not talking about rich ppl we’re talking about billionaires who yes, are not human.

1

Anonymous #1 17w

Is being taxed more “dehumanizing”?

1

Anonymous #2 17w

And that’s exactly what I’m talking about

1

Anonymous OP 17w

No, what #2 said is tho

1

Anonymous #1 17w

yeah I don’t endorse the “rich people aren’t human” part. I’m not really sure they said anything to that effect before you said they were dehumanizing rich people tho your OG reply really did make it sound like you believed in a hereditary 1%. I think that’s why they called you a Nazi

6

Anonymous #1 17w

These are ppl who have built bunkers to sit in while the world erupts into nuclear war, watch us all die while sipping champagne, and then come out to take over again. They don’t consider you human. I’m just matching the energy

7

Anonymous OP 17w

No I am 100% calling billionaires lizard people in human skin

1

Anonymous #2 17w

Bucket agrees why should we humanize them when they don’t even humanize us or care about the stability of our world

5