Anonymous #1 4w

there is no such thing as a hereditary “top 1%”.

9

Anonymous #1 4w

Tf you mean both

10

Anonymous #1 4w

Fence sitter we got a fence sitter! 🫵

10

Anonymous just_a_bucket 4w

I don’t think he’s a fence sitter I think he’s a Nazi. Bro actually thinks a hereditary top 1% exists

10

Anonymous #2 4w

Dehumanizing rich people is bad, and so is eugenics

1

Anonymous #1 4w

Oh well that’s a bit different. We’re not talking about rich ppl we’re talking about billionaires who yes, are not human.

1

Anonymous #1 4w

Is being taxed more “dehumanizing”?

1

Anonymous #2 4w

And that’s exactly what I’m talking about

1

Anonymous OP 4w

No, what #2 said is tho

1

Anonymous #1 4w

yeah I don’t endorse the “rich people aren’t human” part. I’m not really sure they said anything to that effect before you said they were dehumanizing rich people tho your OG reply really did make it sound like you believed in a hereditary 1%. I think that’s why they called you a Nazi

6

Anonymous #1 4w

These are ppl who have built bunkers to sit in while the world erupts into nuclear war, watch us all die while sipping champagne, and then come out to take over again. They don’t consider you human. I’m just matching the energy

7

Anonymous OP 4w

No I am 100% calling billionaires lizard people in human skin

1

Anonymous #2 4w

Bucket agrees why should we humanize them when they don’t even humanize us or care about the stability of our world

5