Anonymous #2 23h

You sound uneducated and insane 💔

-2

Anonymous #3 23h

It’s an observation based on memory. So when you say that to someone stating an observation, that what they saw made them insane, we would normally call that gaslighting. I may be one of the worst people to gaslight on the planet now so… do try to enjoy however the golden rule sends that one back your direction.

7

Anonymous #3 22h

You could have made a point, but apparently an insult was easier.

7

Anonymous OP 22h

Very true - I mean I thought it was obvious that it’s not the president’s job to “release” anything, as the DOJ is supposed to work independently of the president’s campaign, but I guess not! Bro found it actually shocking that the democratic campaign didn’t include “I, the president, will do the DOJ’s job and not the president’s job” but yes - an insult was easier than typing all that out, ty

1

Anonymous OP 22h

I mean idk, can you explain how #2’s point that the democrats didn’t campaign on doing the DOJ’s job is a surprising detail, and that they should’ve done what Trump did - promise to overstep the boundaries of the executive office and politicize the DOJ - was a superior campaign strategy?

1

Anonymous #1 22h

How the hell is obamas birth certificate more important than releasing the Epstein files and prosecuting people?

6

Anonymous #2 21h

Plenty of Dems publicly said they supported the release, they just didn’t make it a major campaign point because Trump and the entire rep base would have said “you just think there are republicans on it and will fabricate stuff if you win”. That and there are actual policy points that you’re supposed to campaign on, not really on whether exposing pedos is right or wrong lol. The fact he even chose to make a such public stance on what’s a universally accepted to be morally correct action is odd

5

Anonymous #5 21h

Especially since he went back on it and doesn’t think exposing pedos is correct anymore now that he is back in power and demanding more and more…

6

Anonymous #1 21h

“Investigation fringe and debunked conspiracy theories is more important than exposing known and documented child sex traffickers” 🤡

4

Anonymous #5 21h

Well it took 3 AI searches for it to give me the dates but it would appear no democrats pressed for their release until 2025, nor did any campaign on that being an aimed goal. One moment I’ll send the screenshots.

1

Anonymous #2 19h

Because they were still sealed for the Maxwell case?

1

Anonymous OP 19h

First search confirmed the date you just gave for the unsealing OP. Very strange they kept them sealed for years after her sentencing.

1

Anonymous OP 19h

BUT! Good news is. Since she was convicted of sex trafficking minors. It means they had enough evidence to conclude that did take place. So the government’s excuse that there isn’t enough evidence to convict many of the people who were frequenting the island, appears to be an outright lie. Now we just need to keep persistent pressure on this metaphorical 🎯 and not get distracted by the news saying nonsense about aliens, AI, or any other “look over here!” topic.

1

Anonymous #2 19h

So the Dems did support their release too, just not as an entire campaign point. That and the Dems *are* complicit in plenty of our avoidable issues we have rn, and can’t just be excused because some def are in the files too. All we can hope is enough people with a backbone in positions of power are able to keep the pressure up and they get released

1

Anonymous #2 10h

As your image calls out, her appeals were not exhausted, meaning her files could not be unsealed until September 17th, 2024.

1