Anonymous #2 1w

🤣

1

Anonymous #1 1w

literally every single one of those links are broken what

3

Anonymous #1 1w

?

5

Anonymous #3 1w

Really? They opened for me 🧐 If that’s true though that makes sense that people are saying they’re unrelated bc they didn’t even try to read them 😂

-2

Anonymous #2 1w

It’s a pdf report.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

.pdf have high ass risks of containing embedded files, zero day was caused by this shi. I’m not criticizing you if your op of them, I’m just saying normally opening up direct file links is not the smartest thing to do, you shouldn’t do it either

15

Anonymous #2 1w

Got you, thank you. I didn’t know that.

1

Anonymous #2 1w

It’s fucking Harvard.edu. I’m sure it’s fine 🙄

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Stay safe on the internet, scammers and hackers out there true enemy of America

1

Anonymous #4 1w

That’s what most employees of large corporations think too 4, social engineering gets the best of us. Safest thing you can do is manually find the document through a safe path

1

Anonymous #1 1w

They opened for me, they just said the opposite of what the conservative was arguing lmao

6

Anonymous OP 1w

No you have to read the whole thing and use your thinking skills. It’s basically saying how quantity is being pushed over quality. Theres even an article saying how dei can do it right with different methods but what they’re doing right now is not it. No one outright hates diversity for the fun of it. If that’s what you think then you’ve got it wrong.

-1

Anonymous #1 1w

This is literally the opposite of what the study says😭

1

Anonymous OP 1w

It explains both sides mannnn. Come on

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Thoughts on how to do it the right way

1

Anonymous OP 1w

damn sorry guys ignore me lmao I got no clue why they’re not opening for me

6

Anonymous #1 1w

You’re an idiot. #7 asked #11 to provide a study that found that the standards to become a pilot had been lowered for women and black people, and #11 replies with a study about how sensitivity training isn’t effective, a study about how racism is cognitively based, and a study about what causes women and black people to drop out of flight school, NONE OF WHICH had anything to do with the question that was asked

5

Anonymous #3 1w

Probably line breaks

9

Anonymous OP 1w

It’s supportive information. If you can’t see how, then I’m not the idiot. If you want an article titled “airlines only hire under qualified poc for Dei movement” you’re not gonna find that because that’s not necessarily the case, and not something a company would say out loud. Unless you’re Disney, Disney admitted to it.

-1

Anonymous #1 1w

No. That wasn’t the question. The question was “provide a source that found that standards are lower for women in Black people to become pilots.” The question wasn’t about racial sensitivity training, it wasn’t about what methods are best for removing cognitive racial biases, and it wasn’t about black people and women who dropped out of the program. The referenced studies had NOTHING to do with the discussion.

12