Anonymous #2 1d

First of all have you read the case? Second of all that happens many times in other places in the country and it’s not talked about

-4

Anonymous OP 1d

And now it’s being talked about and encouraging others to do the same which is why it’s a big deal, yes I’ve read the damn case

11

Anonymous #2 1d

I asked if you had read the case because if you have then it’s clear that it was NOT gang rape. Should they have done it? No. Was it rape? Absolutely not. She invited the whole thing and afterwards doubled down that it was fine and she would even be open to doing it again. And then she got mad that they didn’t invite her to a party.

-4

Anonymous OP 1d

you’re a rapist

9

Anonymous #2 1d

Good argument wow I’m officially convinced

-3

Anonymous OP 1d

Its not my place to convince you, you’re just ignorant

8

Anonymous #2 1d

You just don’t have a response

-3

Anonymous OP 1d

It’d be too long 🤷🏼‍♀️ not worth my time

5

Anonymous OP 1d

I'll bite. Your version is the defense's spin, not the record. The lawsuit alleges she was drugged and assaulted for hours by up to 7 guys, with one texting friends there was "free p***y." The DA who passed on it in 2024 is now taking it to a grand jury, and the governor appointed NY's AG as special prosecutor. Nobody does that for a case that's "clearly not rape." And you still dodged #1: which "certain communities"? Say it with your chest.

11