Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
How it would’ve been if Kamala was president since she also supported Israel’s actions. American foreign policy as a whole is a problem.
68 upvotes, 16 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "How it would’ve been if Kamala was president since she also supported Israel’s actions. American foreign policy as a whole is a problem."
upvote 68 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

She wouldn't have done this

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

Even so the point is that domestically we wouldnt be in so much shit.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

It’s kinda funny how people think that this conflict wouldn’t have happened under any other president. The US government is owned by Israel. This was gonna happen regardless

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

the u.s. government isn’t owned by Israel and Kamala likely would’ve accepted the terms that Omani mediators mentioned about inspectors and forfeiture of enriched uranium

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

Yeah, she would’ve done much worse. She would’ve let Israel do whatever they want while we send out billions untethered so they can keep restocking bombs to carpet bombs civilian areas. Atleast trump is making sure that us intelligence is involved and minimizing collateral.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 3w

Also, before you bring up the school Iran, remember that Biden+Kamala leveled 80 percent of Gaza(including schools, mosques, hospitals, and safe zones)

upvote 9 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

The us goverment is owned by isreal bud

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> purple_boat59 3w

any proof of that?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

Epstein files? Netanyahu directly saying that he’s grateful the US carried out the attack he’s been wanting for decades? The fact that we give Israel nearly $4 billion a year?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w
post
upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w
post
upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w
post
upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w
post
upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Epstein was a co-opted intelligence asset used to facilitate a transnational blackmail operation but his goal wasn’t for Israel to “own” the U.S. but to ensure that American elites, regardless of party, remained committed to a pro-Israel, pro-interventionist foreign policy by holding compromising leverage over key figures, this isn’t a foreign conspiracy, this is a failure of capitalist legal systems that protect the ultra-wealthy allowing intelligences agencies (both Mossad and CIA) to exploit

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

the recent Iran strikes are a joint effort to eliminate a shared rival that threatens both Israeli regional dominance and American control over global energy markets, the U.S. sees Israel as a permanent military outpost to avoid the domestic political cost of stationing hundreds of thousands of U.S. troops in the region, both Trump and Netanyahu are accused of using these strikes a spectacle to distract from domestic scandals, including their respective legal battles and Epstein file fallout

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

also since the majority of military aid must be spent on American-made weapons, the aid is actually a transfer of US taxpayer money to private defense contractors like Boeing and Lockheed Martin, Israel served as a real-world testing ground for new US weaponry and surveillance technology, which is then marketed globally as battle-proven, the US doesn’t give aid because it is owned, it pays the $4 billion as a retainer fee to maintain a loyal, nuclear-armed partner that can protect West interests

upvote 1 downvote