Anonymous #2 18h

Yeah it’s called having responsibilities when you’re a gigantic extremely powerful country. Something something great power and responsibility

15

Anonymous OP 18h

It’s very easy to be in favor of something when someone else foots the bill

2

Anonymous #2 18h

Again, if you’re a huge ass country, then yes you should be expected to use your weight to help the rest of the world. If you don’t want that responsibility then gtfo

10

Anonymous OP 18h

Or vote no. Which they did. It’s not like they’re stopping the rest of the world from doing it with their own money

1

Anonymous #1 11h

Yeah but it’s like the USA alone, could military (physically) crush 199 people, and also supplies the 199 along with their friends as the number one food exporter. So the 199 vote like “food should be a right!” And America, who’s doing all the supplying is like “No? No. wtf?” 199 votes “give us more money!” America: “Are you fucking high?!”

1

Anonymous #1 11h

Also they aren’t even democratically elected… they are literally a conglomerate of appointees with no authority who can’t even keep their own troops from starting sex slave rings when they go “rescue” a country. Why we are still providing them funding is absolutely absurd.

1

Anonymous #3 11h

I mean tbh America can’t exactly stop its own troops from doing heinous shit when they go “rescue” a country either so that’s not much of a leg for America to stand on

1

Anonymous #1 11h

Worst thing I’m aware of was the prison incidents in Iraq which were a humiliation thing. You’re right, we should have been able to prevent that. But I’m not aware of our soldiers operating any sex slavery rings dating back to the beginning of Iraq Afghanistan… or the gulf war… or Cold War… Possibly Vietnam.

1

Anonymous #3 11h

I don’t think they ran rings but they definitely were out there raping people en masse. I don’t think they organized it, they just kinda did it.

1

Anonymous #1 11h

There were prostitution rings on ships I can recall being investigated. Gay/straight/otherwise. But nothing I can recall invading and then setting up sex slavery rings with rescued civilians. The Iraq prisoner abuse were allegedly combatants (not that it makes it any less horrible) but studying how these things can be prevented, you really have to mess up to be an unelected governing body “voting” on what democracies should do, while your own troops are notorious for sexually enslaving the 1/2

1

Anonymous #3 11h

2/2 people they rescue.

1

Anonymous #3 11h

And then the Evil Woke Left didn’t like the war crimes, so we elected a guy whose pick for Secretary of Defense/War’s entire thing is “Man, we gotta get back to raping and pillaging, and stop listening to these bleeding hearts who say that raping and pillaging is bad”

1

Anonymous #1 11h

I’m def not saying our military is sinless, but taking orders from the unelected on what we should be doing when they have a worse record than us, isn’t something I’m going to take seriously.

1

Anonymous #1 11h

Our troops or the UN? It’s possible I missed something when this was an area of focus for one of my studies.

1