Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Well, the USA is a finished colonial project and Israel isn’t is the issue. I guess it all depends on what “shouldn’t exist” means to you. Because I think Israel shouldn’t exist, but I don’t necessarily believe citizens should be removed from Israel.

_orangutan

if israel should not exist then neither should the US
upvote 7 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

No one is disenfranchised by the dissolution of a genocidal apartheid state

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Shouldn’t exist as a state I think is what he means

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Right but like what does that functionally entail? Who is disenfranchised by this hypothetical change you feel me?

upvote 1 downvote
🦧
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

does indigenous sovereignty translate to disenfranchisement to you? mind you, the white ethnostate readily disenfranchises large segments of its voting base

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Meant to respond to OP but you know what I mean

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> _orangutan 2w

No not necessarily I’m literally just asking who if any would be disenfranchised no need to get defensive man. Im just asking you what this change *functionally looks like* Like what changes? Are we just doing a hypothetical regime change or what?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> _orangutan 2w

And disenfranchisement isn’t even inherently bad. Like, I’d very much like to see the leaders of both America and Israel to be “disenfranchised” lmao

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Ur good

upvote 1 downvote