Anonymous #2 1w

If white people did what Indians did to Canada 100 years ago in Africa we still wouldn't hear the end about it from you guys

-4

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

I don't think its culture, a lot of countries are statistically less intelligent by IQ score (not going to name names)

-5

Anonymous #2 1w

A lot of Americans took horse tranquilizer because their favorite rapist told them it was safer than a vaccine. Even if IQ was a useful metric it still wouldn’t amount to a valid reason to oppose legal immigration

8

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

I take horse tranquilizer because it makes me k hole so I can't blame them

0

Anonymous #2 1w

That tracks lmao

10

Anonymous #2 1w

I mean, you’d see it as a punishment but we wouldn’t.

6

Anonymous #3 1w

And I think part of it is also just like white people generally aren’t used to being a minority, so the idea of not being the default is just kind of inherently scary. There’s also an ethnonationalism element to it where they feel if the country is no longer mostly their demographic it will no longer be their country.

3

Anonymous OP 1w

Yeah cause you're cucked, unsurprising

-1

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

People in Africa snort cocaine mixed with gunpowder because they think the god of war will approve of it, atleast when I do my drugs I know and have scientific reasoning to support what I know will happen

-2

Anonymous #2 1w

You mean…if white people simply moved and peacefully settled?

1

Anonymous #4 1w

If white people largely changed the makeup of a population, "peacefully" settled, started creating ethnic enclaves inside of other countries, and created their own quasi governments you would almost certainly call it colonialism and regard it as evil and imperialistic, especially if it took place in Africa.

-3

Anonymous #2 1w

“Largely changed the makeup of a population” it’s 7% get a fucking grip 💀

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Bold of you to assume they had a brain in the first place. They’ve never been to Canada. They only see what social media spoon feeds them. They don’t think for themselves and simply assume Canada is some communist hellscape and the entire country looks like Brampton 😭

6

Anonymous #4 1w

Don’t get me wrong. Life is hard, but it’s a lot harder when you’re stupid. I think #2 will soon find that out the hard way.

9

Anonymous #4 1w

Afrikaaners made up similar amounts of Rhodesia and South Africa, Zulus should've just "got a fucking grip" lol

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Source? Because from what I see, the white population in SA peaked at 22%. Assuming a 50/50 split between English and Dutch descent, 11% is still more than 50% the level you’re complaining about in a country you don’t even live in

1

Anonymous #4 1w

Similar doesn't mean equal

0

Anonymous #2 1w

It’s not even similar. It’s over 50% more, and that’s assuming a 50/50 split when there were almost certainly more Afrikaners than English at the time 💀

1

Anonymous #4 1w

Its not 50% more its around 4% more

-1

Anonymous #2 1w

The proportion is 50% larger, just like 3/4 of a pizza is 50% larger than 1/2 of a pizza

2

Anonymous #2 1w

The reason the afrikaners and rhodesians were disproportionately influential was because they held all the government and economic power and used it to take resources from native Africans. That is what distinguishes immigration from settler colonialism. Immigrants do not hold disproportionate power and exist alongside the already present population.

2

Anonymous #3 1w

They held disproportionate amounts of power in institutions they built, thats how it always goes.

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Yeah institutions they built by taking land from the people already present. I’m not here to argue about the history of South Africa, I’m pointing out that Indian immigrants don’t control the government of Canada to the exclusion of other groups and never will that’s why percentages don’t matter.

4

Anonymous #2 1w

U realize when different racial groups are raised in the same conditions and given the same education their IQ is gonna be the same…right? Like wow, a continent that’s been systematically kept poor has underfunded schools who would’ve thought

4

Anonymous #2 1w

That’s like saying “well California has a higher IQ than Louisiana” no fucking shit ppl in California have a higher IQ. Louisiana is poor asf compared to California. Ur sooo fucking smart dude who would’ve thought poor countries can’t afford better education

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1w

Except California and Louisiana have similar average IQs because despite the education gap they still have similar numbers in non white racial demographics

-2

Anonymous #2 1w

Dude get your racist ass outta here. There’s nothing of substance to back up any of these claims so stop wasting everyone’s time with this hateful bullshit

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1w

Tbf a better example probably would’ve been Louisiana vs New York or Maryland

4

Anonymous #2 1w

Buddy you barely understand the difference between percentages and percentage points, I’d pack it up

6

Anonymous #4 1w

I was running on a few hours of sleep kms thanks😭 but yea, areas with underfunded schools are gonna have lower IQs than areas where they actually have money and the ability to educate yk? Like u said, Maryland has a higher IQ than Louisiana because they have better schooling.

1