Anonymous #1 3d

And what does it tell you?

1

Anonymous #2 3d

A healthy amount of fear is good yet not to the point of deference

-2

Anonymous OP 3d

I’m not sure if you genuinely don’t understand my sarcasm or what

5

Anonymous #2 3d

The amount of harm that colt like twisted religion has produced is not something to be laughed at. Do you not forget Mau, Stalin, Hitler, Inver, Tito, Mussolini, Idi Amin, Pol Pot, and other such figures?

0

You can’t deny fact. Go ahead and try. Great job dumbass. Denying that Hitler got elected. Their office went real well for the German folks too.

1

Interesting how I packed only just one example in a long, long list of examples in many many books, including the history books.

3

Anonymous OP 2d

1. He wasn’t a socialist 2. No one said he wasn’t elected. He was 3. He still wasn’t a socialist 4. Hitler was bad because he was very very racist and was a facist 5. Yes you can be a facist and a socialist 6. He still wasn’t a socialist by any means besides name 7. You don’t know how to read

1

Anonymous #5 2d

#3 & 5, what ur telling me is Hitler, a Nat-*SOCIALIST* wasn’t elected? Or was he. I’m confused. Either my opinion is invalid, there were never any socialists in 🇩🇪, and nothing happened from 190-50, or, there was a prominent socialist who enacted terrible policies on. His people. This is the only picking and choosing you can really do with facts of history.

1

#3: So by saying Hitler the Democratic National Socialist is a fasict (an aligned and allied yet separate Italic party & ideology), is like if I see an 🦧 at the zoo, and I say, "Hey, look at that 🦍 over there", and your like: na mate: that thing's a 🐎.

1

Anonymous OP 2d

INT’L vs. NAT Socialist: Like yeah, I mean I guess we’re both “technically wrong” but like come oooon. Like yeah he’s facist and socialist and fought commies and socialists but they were INT’L Socialists, he was a NAT Socialist.

1