Anonymous #1 1d

It’s immigration.

24

Anonymous OP 1d

Immigration is when it’s only a few people. When there is an influx in such a huge quantity, that’s an invasion.

-6

Anonymous #1 1d

The Trump admin is fast tracking white Afrikaners who basically have nothing to do with our culture or language. I hereby declare this an invasion according to your standards

11

Anonymous #1 1d

No rightoid. You don’t just get to redefine terms.

10

Anonymous #2 1d

those people are coming here legally. Technically, it can be considered an invasion, but those people are not breaking the law

-2

Anonymous OP 1d

No, go open a dictionary

-2

Anonymous #1 1d

Goalpost shifted again. We were talking about immigration not illegal immigration

8

Anonymous #1 1d

I literally did before making that comment lmfao, immigration ≠ invasion. Why are rightoids so brainwashed?

4

Anonymous #1 1d

Not to mention they have been fast-tracked over victims of actual war and genocide who have been patiently (legally) waiting much longer 🤔

12

Rightoids are vile

8

This is really what it comes down to. It’s not about enforcing law or anything it’s about preferred hierarchy of races set up by white ppl

6

Comment Deleted

0

I was an on the fence voter for the midterms but I’m voting straight republican after this seeing this post

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

“The main difference between invasion and immigration is whether people are entering a country as a hostile or invading force or moving there to live. Immigration is a neutral term, while invasion usually implies force, aggression, or a threat.” Illegally Crossing the border involves aggression and force and meets the definition of an invasion.

-1

Anonymous #1 1d

“People are entering a country as a hostile or invading force or moving there to live” Considering they aren’t entering as a hostile force, despite what the Trump administration lies about (proven false btw), you’re wrong. Not an invasion.

3

Anonymous OP 1d

And maybe we’re looking at two different dictionaries, because mine defines it as an invasion. They become an invasive presence when they engage in disproportionate levels of crime, gang violence, property destruction, excessive noise, and other disruptive behavior. The South Africans however you would not even know that they’re not from the USA

-2

Anonymous #2 1d

Absolutely nothing to do with race or skin color. And disgusting you would even think that.

-1

Anonymous #1 1d

They don’t though.

6

Anonymous #1 1d

All rightoids do is lie

10

Anonymous OP 1d

That chart groups legal and illegal immigration together, rather than distinguishing between the two. Illegal immigration has a higher tendency toward violent criminal activity, so combining both categories doesn’t provide an accurate comparison

0

Anonymous #1 1d

Source?

3

Anonymous OP 1d

My brain. Maybe try using yours too

-1

Anonymous #1 1d

So you’re lying and they don’t skew towards violence? Typical rightoid.

3

Anonymous OP 1d

No it’s the truth. Research it. Go outside and you will literally see it in real life

-1

Anonymous #1 1d

I live in a large metropolitan area with a significant migrant population. You are lying.

7

Anonymous #1 1d

My bwain I made it up 🥹

6

Anonymous #4 1d

Rightoids don’t use sources they just use vibes and expect you to believe them

7

Anonymous #1 1d

Anyway just to get another dunk in, here. Data is a little outdated but I highly doubt you have anything from the last 9 years that show it has changed significantly.

3

Anonymous OP 1d

There are less undocumented immigrants than legal immigrants and US born citizens. So obviously in the aggregate it’s gonna be lower. Please show me a graph which takes the per Capita into consideration.

0

Anonymous #1 1d

Thanks chat

16

Anonymous #1 1d

Plenty of documentation in all three of these studies but I’ve highlighted the main takeaways

3

Anonymous #4 1d

This might be easier to see

4

Anonymous #4 1d

Ah no ig not lmao my b

6