
Why are you automatically assuming they aren’t qualified? You see a minority and assume that Dei placed them there and not merit? Dei helps people achieve the same success with a worse beginning. They still need the merit to get where they’re going. Especially for heavily regulated jobs like pilots that require proven experience for licensure. Jobs where you get appointed by your political ally, that’s where someone without merit can enter the picture
It doesn’t “lower the required SAT”, it standardized it. For example: let’s say you start off with $1,000,000 and someone else starts off with $1,000. You both invest money. You end up with $1,500,000. $500,000 growth, 50% gain. Really impressive! But they went up to $100,000. They “scored” less, sure. But they went up 100x compared to 1.5x. Which is more impressive? Making a lot when you started with a lot, or making less but starting out with way less?
Hey, serious question about DEI. Who do you think is more qualified for the position of Director of National Intelligence Person A: a former lawyer for the Statement who later became Deputy Director of the CIA, Deputy National Security Adviser, and Counsel to the President for National Security Or