
You’re genuinely fucking disgusting because we have mountains of evidence she was raped, we have screenshots of the chat where they bragged about “free pussy” while she was fucking INCAPACITATED and here you are denying that this poor girl was raped for 7 fucking hours. You should be on a fucking watchlist.
A pretty clear joke? You ever seen men joke before? They’re pretty crude. Now let’s focus on evidence that supports them being innocent. Jane Doe literally wanted to go back. According to her she was SA, cool with it, and wanted to hang out with that frat more, but was denied. That is not normal SA victim behavior at all and is much stronger evidence than 1 joke text message. This is actual behavior.
What the fuck is funny about calling an inebriated woman WHO WAS SO DRUNK AND HIGH THAT SHE WAS FALLING IN AND OUT OF CONSCIOUSNESS “free pussy”? You’re fucking sick. She changed her story? Yeah, she probably started remembering more and more of it. Trauma is complicated, she probably had trouble remembering considering she was once again INCAPACITATED. This woman was raped by 7 men for HOURS, and your takeaway is she was a “greedy hoe”.
technically it was a legal strategy. she also had previously also said she cut the screen on the window when it was found completely intact, and she was on enough psych meds to tranq a horse and had to be told everything that happened by a third party. also again by your own words she neither pleaded nor was found guilty so wouldn’t that still make her innocent?
also even if you want to put your hands up and pretend like it could be legally consensual, they took naked photos and videos of the act against her knowledge which is insanely illegal, then sent it in a group chat of 50 people that she didn’t even know existed and that they conveniently forgot to ever mention which is also illegal
Okay and did she say that was what she wanted? Did she explicitly say that she gave consent for them to keep having sex with her even after she was incapacitated due to the amount of drugs and alcohol in her system? Or did she consent to sex while she was conscious and then pass out because of the amount of drugs and alcohol in her system? Don’t try and act like this is some “kink” thing. You should know the difference between a kink and rape is voluntary, informed, and conscious consent.
So if someone were to pass out while you're having sex you wouldn't be concerned as to why they passed out? You don't believe consent can't be taken away? So lets say your having sex and your partner wanted to peg you and you said no. But they did it anyway. How would you feel? Cause you gave consent in the beginning for sex. And following your logic it can't be taken away
Of course I’d be concerned. Especially if it’s bondage. I thought you were referring to feeling very tired and sleepy. If it was sudden I would stop immediately and check if she’s alright. And your peg example doesn’t apply because we don’t know if Cornell frat even had a negotiating phase due to all the drugs it was clear it was all green for anything.
You’re just being ridiculous now. It’s a bunch of high people having fun. They all knew this would happen. They all wanted it to happen. She wanted it to happen. She consented to it happening. She can’t even prove she passed out and not just high. The 7 men are innocent from this evidence.
You refused to answer the question about consent being taken away I posed. If you consented to have sex and your partner wanted to peg you. You said no. But they did it anyways. How would you feel? Or would you let them since consent cant be taken away according to you
you’re just assuming there’s always a negotiating phase though. she was ten shots deep when she got there and anything was even proposed. she was already intoxicated impairing consent in the first place. even if you want to argue that an intoxicated person can give full informed consent—which reasonably they can’t—she stated that she only said yes to the first two during the first threesome and everything after that was not consensual. consent is not blanket and can be revoked at any time
she has said multiple times she does not have a clear memory of the events of the night. you can be able to somewhat piece things together while still not having a “clear memory”. plus AGAIN, even if she was not intoxicated which she was, she didn’t consent to anyone but the first two during the first threesome. your argument would only apply to that even if it was logically sound
gilio lopez forcibly made out with her and raped her, while jonathan newell was part of the first threesome he also groped her even after she pushed his hand away. a few individuals are unnamed in parts of the document, but she said she had to push them off her as they tried to initiate sex. and what tf do you mean witnesses?? if you’re showing up to a message advising “free pussy”and not directly intervening you’re at least an accessory and telling the truth about that would implicate them