Considering that’s just most of history I don’t quite get your point 💀

3

Comment Deleted

0

Maybe the worst bait ever bro try harder next time 💀

4

“It’s just been used to be” 😭

5

Comment Deleted

0

No because the conservatism that held science back was literally religion 💀

4

Comment Deleted

0

Bad troll attempt 2/10 💀

1

Anonymous OP 7w

If you had half a brain you’d understand that religion directly supports and upholds class oppression, racism, and sexism, as part of the superstructure, it is a tool of reaction. The fact these issues persist is hugely thanks to religions role in reaction.

3

That was in the past. But what matters is what’s happening in the present, and right now, religion usually causes more problems for science than it helps. Plus, science doesn’t need religion in order to grow, so why bother with religion?

7

Anonymous OP 7w

Thank you for saying this. Never let anyone convince you otherwise or it will lead you down a dark path

4

Anonymous #3 7w

I’d have to actually have a stroke to fall for religious nonsense so don’t worry lol 🤣

3

Most of science is actually pretty liberal. They only deny conservatism when it’s unscientific, which happens a lot

1

Comment Deleted

0

Define reactionary

5

Comment Deleted

0

Now what do you think reaction means? 💀

6

Comment Deleted

0

What movement typically uses the term reactionary? Would opposing religion be a reaction according to that movement 💀

5

Comment Deleted

0

What movement(s) are conservatives in reaction to? 💀

3

Comment Deleted

0

Reactionary is predominantly used by leftists and Marxists to describe reaction (opposition) to the progress of historical materialism. An atheist or Marxist wouldn’t be “reactionary” unless they were in reaction to progress. What do you mean when “communists” and “atheists” are “reactionary”. In reaction to what?

5

Anonymous OP 7w

*”progress or a specific movement”

3

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

Ok then by its basic level what are they reactionary towards? Politically that term is explicitly connected with the left wing and those against the reaction to scientific progress, so using it in a political discussion against left wing and atheist types doesn’t quite make sense lol

5

If you mean defensive, I’d just ask if you mean that arguing your point makes one defensive?

3

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

So they are in reaction to the people they disagree with? Uhh yeah lol. I feel like you don’t know what this word means even divorced of political context. It doesn’t mean “mean or bad” 💀

5

Ok good troll lmao

3

Comment Deleted

0

If you genuinely intended reactionary to mean disagrees with you then yeah I was wrong. I’m a reactionary because you are ridiculous

5

Insulting and reactionary are not synonymous omg I’m praying you are trolling because it would pain me to know this is the actual “workings” of a human brain 💀

4

Well if conservatives say global warming is not real, they disagree strongly because the evidence says otherwise. That’s just one example

1