Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download

default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

Is there supposed to be some kind of wrongdoing implied here

upvote 9 downvote
🚮
Anonymous 1d

Up until this, I thought the efforts to make this a big deal was silly and pointless. The Democracy party has once again attempted to do the most bad faith thing possible to sabotage the perception our elections are fair and worth engaging in.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

I don’t get it. Are they not allowed to have many people run to divert votes from the opposition

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> enemyofmyenemy 1d

Yep, I think people on both sides should see this for what it is

upvote 5 downvote
🚮
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

Like republicans are so stupid for crying wolf about every election they throw away by promoting wacko candidates Only for democrats to pull stuff like this every once and a while that’s so deeply poisonous to the country. They will act like this is no big deal and then when republicans respond by trying to do it in every race I will have to hear endlessly about how democracy is under attack

upvote 8 downvote
🚮
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1d

Why do you people have no morals Most of the country can barely read and write how do you expect people to understand who they are voting for if you do this crap. It’s obviously bad faith and an effort to win by any means necessary instead of convincing people you are the best candidate. Take the extreme. What if republicans respond by piling every nationwide race with identically named candidates. Because they will use whatever is used against them 100x over.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1d

They’re obviously allowed to considering he’s on the ballot but it’s shady at worst and just plain ridiculous at best

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1d

spoilers and just multiple candidates in general have existed since the dawn of time, but because trump's terrified of losing his dictatorship he can make up rigging allegations even though it was already determined that he was running in good faith after he was taken off the ballot once

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> enemyofmyenemy 1d

Oh you’re saying they’re promoting people with the exact name? Yea that’s underhanded. But the high road has been forfeit long ago so this is the new normal

upvote 5 downvote
🚮
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1d

Republicans are not smart enough to try new ideas. They copy what democrats successfully use against them at scale. Anything you’re referring to was done by people who want change at any cost. Think election fraud, judicial nominees, racial congressional districts, etc. It was all done by democrats first who received no negative blowback, and then when republicans go scorched earth and do it everywhere, it’s suddenly seen as unacceptable.

upvote -1 downvote
🚮
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

Assuming the reporting is correct, it’s the definition of bad faith. If one district court ruling is all it takes to change your morals, I have a lot of things you should support

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> enemyofmyenemy 1d

Republicans normalized messing with elections. I think the dems are just now acting like republicans

upvote 1 downvote
🚮
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1d

I am 90% sure you were born after 2002

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> enemyofmyenemy 1d

“I will not actually address what you said” -You

upvote 1 downvote
🚮
Anonymous replying to -> #6 15h

There’s a character limit and I don’t plan on spending more time on this if you can’t figure out what I meant lol

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> enemyofmyenemy 14h

You didn’t spend any time on what I said. You threw out a deflection tactic hoping that would suffice and now you’re complaining that it didn’t

upvote 1 downvote
🚮
Anonymous replying to -> #6 14h

Your opinion leads me to believe you have spent very little time researching disputed elections in this country. It was occurring before there was a Republican Party.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> enemyofmyenemy 14h

Read what I said again, I said normalized, I didn’t say they were the only ones to ever do it in the history of the US

upvote 1 downvote
🚮
Anonymous replying to -> #6 14h

lol oh ok well then I completely agree ☺️

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> enemyofmyenemy 14h

There’s an irony in you not understanding me and you telling me I lacked comprehension skills

upvote 1 downvote
🚮
Anonymous replying to -> #6 14h

lol oh ok well then I completely agree ☺️

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> enemyofmyenemy 14h

And again!

upvote 1 downvote
🚮
Anonymous replying to -> #6 13h

I’m tempted to do it a third time lol

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> enemyofmyenemy 13h

Do it

upvote 1 downvote
🚮
Anonymous replying to -> #6 13h

Mmmm I don’t wanna

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> enemyofmyenemy 13h

Go ahead

upvote 1 downvote