
You know they’re not stupid right? Even if you say “grape” or 🍇 they’re still going to understand the context and think “rape”. It’s not helping shit. You can see the word then know you should avoid looking at the rest if it’s triggering. If anything you’re making survivors of rape think of it when they see grapes too. You’re falling for a corporate psyop meant to censor the masses. It was never about avoiding triggers and always about removing, silencing, and dismissing topics
You’re wrong - using an emoji to describe a violent sex crime is dismissing the seriousness of it. Actually laughable that you can claim I don’t take victims seriously while you’re using fucking fruit emojis to describe a sexual assault. Should we all change our language to mitigate any possibility that someone may be sensitive to the words we say? What if crime triggers me? Should the news say there was a mass “boom boom” down the street instead of a mass shooting? Shut up and get a job.
R u okay.. “crime” as a trigger is a crazy reach to relate. Now think of gun assault victims.. do u expect them to not be triggered when they hear of a shooting or hear shots being fired? Same fucking concept u dope! U can disagree but claiming I’m not taking it seriously bc I’m trying to be SENSITIVE OF VICTIMS WHO HAVE MENTIONED HOW THE WORD TRIGGERS THEM is absolutely insane.. ur argument is trash. I can’t be wrong when victims have explicitly said this so fuck off
Oh so you’re the arbiter of all triggers? No one’s trigger is valid unless you bless it? Obviously veterans and survivors of school shootings may be triggered by gun shots - do we not use the word “gun” online to protect them? Do we restrict fireworks on the Fourth of July? No. Changing the words to sound more comforting is wrong - it is a criminal sex act, of course it should sound uncomfortable to hear. You’re downplaying the seriousness of these things.