Anonymous #2 4d

me if i was fucking stupid

16

Anonymous #5 4d

Exactly

-4

Anonymous #1 4d

You are. Don’t worry

-2

Anonymous #5 4d

If anything on that list was true you might be right

2

Anonymous #2 4d

i wasn’t worried about your opinion of me anyways lmao im more worried for your critical thinking skills

1

Anonymous #2 4d

like “working class” bffr the leader of your party is a multibillionaire who has never worked a day in his life bro does NOT care about the working class he just wants to make the rich richer

1

Anonymous #2 4d

“favor term limits” you guys want trump to run for a third term as president despite that being against the 22nd amendment

1

Anonymous #2 4d

“free speech” your administration pressured ABC into suspending the jimmy kimmel show because he disagreed with trump

1

Anonymous #2 4d

shall i go on?

1

Anonymous #1 4d

You can keep lying if you feel you must, IDC

0

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 4d

Wait till you find out fetus just means child or offspring in Latin. And is just used to dehumanize unborn human babies.

0

Anonymous #8 4d

And Tyrannosaurus rex means tyrant lizard king…is the trex a king or lizard?

1

Anonymous #8 4d

And no fetus is a scientific term not a derogatory term or whatever ur trynna argue lmao

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 4d

Is tyrannosaurus any less animal? Why not call it a baby

0

Anonymous #2 4d

what there is a lie? i can provide sources for any of those

1

Anonymous #8 4d

U didn’t answer my question and I never said it wasn’t an animal. Was the t-rex a king or lizard…

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 4d

Are we talking about the naming of species or the dehumanization of humans that already belong to the human species?

0

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 4d

Also would calling the Tyrannosaurus any name make it less of what it actually is? Or change what it is in reality?

0

Anonymous #8 4d

Bro ur talking about what something means in Latin like that changes anything. I’m using ur argument against u. In Latin Tyrannosaurus rex means tyrant lizard king. T-rex wasn’t a tyrant, king, and dinosaurs aren’t lizards

2

Anonymous #8 4d

A fetus isn’t a human yet. It’s a mass of human tissue. It DEVELOPS into a human. Do yk what development means?

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 4d

Ohh it isn’t human. Care to explain what it is? A goat? A dog? A cat?

0

Anonymous #8 4d

A fetus….its not a human yet lmao. It has to DEVELOP into a human. What is development?

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 4d

Development is the process of growing. So when does it become a human

0

Anonymous #8 4d

When it loses the gills, tail, and has the same basic structures a human should…like a brain, heart, skeleton, eyes ect…

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 4d

Oh so basic structure determines humanity?

-1

Anonymous #8 4d

When it comes to developing from cells to person lmao

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 3d

You’re made out of cells. Just more than someone smaller or younger than you

-1

Anonymous #8 3d

Not all clumps of human cells are equal.

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 3d

Ahh so there are some people who inherently have more value than others? Like eugenics?

0

Anonymous #8 3d

I said human cells not races lmao. Ur comparing apples to oranges. Not all human cells are equal lmao

1

Anonymous #8 3d

Like I don’t understand how ur not tired of trying to misconstrued my argument into something I never said only to be proven wrong…like…

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 3d

You’re devaluing and dehumanizing someone based on age, physical aspects, or development. These are extremely loose points to define humanity or moral worth on.

0

Anonymous #8 3d

Once again, not all cells are equal. Yall want to and only view women as incubators. A fetus doesn’t age the same way ppl does lmao. If you take an embryo and put it in the freezer for 30 years and then implant a woman with it…how old is the baby after 15 years? Ur not gonna say they’re 45. That’s because u don’t start aging until after ur born

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 3d

No I want to view pregnant women as mothers lol. Not just incubators. U wanna view a human baby as a parasite or just a clump of cells.

1

Anonymous #8 3d

Babies are already developed humans. A fetus is not…

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 3d

A fetus is just an unborn baby. At what point is it not a fetus

0

Anonymous #8 3d

It’s not a fetus when it has the basic functions to survive outside of the womb…

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 2d

So when would u say that is? What about a baby that’s born and has to go on life support? Less human?

0

Anonymous #8 2d

Babies that are born that have to go on life support still have the basic functions to live outside of the womb…

1

Anonymous #8 2d

And it’s not a fetus anymore at around 21 weeks, aka when it has the basic functions to live outside of the womb..

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1d

No they don’t lol. That’s why they’re on life support 😂

1

Anonymous #8 1d

That’s wrong and life support is kinda the wrong word. Life support implies the same kind that brain dead patients are on, where a machine does all the work keeping their organs going. Premature babies are put in an incubator similar to eggs. They need higher temperatures because their body hasn’t developed enough to self regulate it and they can’t fight off infections. They can still do all the other things that babies can do (which admittedly isn’t much, they’re pretty fucking useless)

1

Anonymous #8 1d

Premature birth used to be a literal death sentence with the mortality being something like 90% until a literal fucking carney on Coney Island put them in incubators as a freak show attraction 😭

1

Anonymous #8 1d

Like #8 said they aren’t on life support. They’re put in incubators. Besides not having a fully developed immune system and being able to regulate their body temperature, pre-mature babies can and do survive outside of the womb…be this “debate” has been going on for 2 fucking days and you have yet to give an actual argument or any facts…

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1d

average argument with a conservative tbh

1

Anonymous #1 1d

Rs. Granted I wouldn’t respond for like 10 hours so but fucking still😭 that’s 10 hours to come up with a good argument

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1d

bros had plenty of time fr

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1d

Neither have you lol😂😂. All u wanna do is say it’s not a human yet without giving consistent grounds that warrants humanity. All of the reasons you’ve given aren’t reliable and applicable to every situation. All in effort to dehumanize the killing of unborn humans so you don’t have to feel bad abt it

-1

Anonymous #8 1d

I literally have been…it’s not human. It’s not considered human until it has the basics to deploy consciousness and survive outside of the womb on its own😭 all u did was strawman my arguments

1

Anonymous #8 1d

Ur only argument is “what does fetus mean in Latin” and I debunked that shit by using animal scientific names cause it’s usually Latin lmfao. U don’t have an actual argument for my Tyrannosaurus argument.

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1d

That’s not my only argument, I was merely pointing out the hypocrisy of your own language. Are we even talking about dinosaurs?😂😂

0

Anonymous #8 1d

U bot realizing I used ur argument against u is kinda sad. Was T-Rex a tyrant, lizard, or king?

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1d

What would you call it?

0

Anonymous #8 1d

U can’t answer a yes or no question with a question 😭 doesn’t fucking matter what I’d call it I’m asking u if it was a lizard, a king, or a tyrant

5

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1d

Exact my point! It doesn’t matter what you call it. Still the same thing right? Same thing with a baby. Fetus, baby; still a human. Whether u wanna admit or not. Thank you for proving my argument for me

-1

Anonymous #8 1d

Bro the fact u don’t get my argument says a whole bunch. I’m saying it doesn’t matter I call it for the sake of this argument. U have YET TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION

1

Anonymous #8 1d

Tyrannosaurus means tyrant lizard king in Latin. IS IT A FUCKING LIZARD, KING, OR TYRANT. U can’t be this fucking brain dead. It’s a yes or no fucking question. Answer it

1

Anonymous #8 1d

Oh also important context, premature babies’ organs aren’t *fully* developed so you could argue their similarity to a fetus, but it’d be much more similar to an on time baby which their skulls aren’t developed and need to fuse together. a clump of cells with no definitive form and even lacking many vital organs is not a human being in the same way a premature or on-time baby is

2

Anonymous #7 1d

It’s still a human being no? Just like an amputee isn’t a “full human” in the same way as a completely healthy individual. Still a human. Your definition of human is based on age, physical attributes, or location. All of which are subjective bases of reasoning and determining humanity. It is not possible give a definitive answer for what is a human in these circumstances. Why not agree it’s a human in the early stages of development and just not kill it?

1