Anonymous #1 13w

This might actually be a tough case considering there are some studies that link it. The standards for proving defamation in the US are pretty high. Idek if you can sue the government for defamation 💀

5

Anonymous #3 13w

They’re owned by Kenvue, a Johnson and Johnson spinoff. They have money but their legal team is knee-deep in talc lawsuits rn 💀

2

Anonymous #2 13w

an absolute wwe superslam smackdown against the us government would make that a nonissue real fast

1

Anonymous #2 13w

The data shows there’s a correlation between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and neurodevelopmental disorders, which most likely is only bc we understand autism more so there’s more diagnoses and more women take tylenol now bc it’s the only safe option. Tylenol use going up and autism rates going up being correlated doesn’t mean all that much when there’s a billion other factors. So a normal person saying Tylenol causes autism may actually be grounds. But you’re right idk about suing the Gov

21

Anonymous #2 13w

Each subset of companies has their own legal team. There’s enough people to handle it

4

Anonymous #5 13w

They need to look at risks of Zoloft and zofran. A lot of medications interfere with prenatal development, if simple supplements and herbs can fuck with a fetus, why do people trust big pharma so fucking much? Tylenol is the #1 leading cause of cirrhosis of the liver and general liver disease.

5

Anonymous #2 13w

You’re right. My bad.

1

Anonymous #6 13w

Idk if we can compare an unproven link between Tylenol and autism to a definitive link between thalidomide and babies lacking entire limbs

1

Anonymous #7 13w

It’s medicine that was approved for pregnancies later being revealed as bad. There are similarities we shouldn’t just blatantly trust big pharma.

-2

Anonymous #6 13w

Yes, although I don’t think the US ever approved it

11

Anonymous #2 13w

The US did not approve it, which is another reason the two shouldn’t be compared. Tylenol has been thoroughly tested and approved to be safely used during pregnancy.

5

Anonymous #7 13w

There is reason for it to be compared.

0

Anonymous #6 13w

That being?

1

Anonymous #7 13w

I’ve already mentioned it.

-2

Anonymous #6 13w

Right, so what you said was not correct information. It was never approved in the US for use during pregnancy. Unlike Tylenol, which is and has been for years and years. So I guess the use of coloring the two would be to show we should trust approved and rigorously tested medications.

1

Anonymous #7 13w

Comparing*

1

Anonymous #6 13w

FDA already warns against both of these medications

1

Anonymous #7 13w

Who mentioned it being approved by US specifically? It was prescribed to women here however.

-2

Anonymous #7 13w

It’s an example not to trust big pharma.

-1

Anonymous #6 13w

Idk how else to explain to you that you cannot compare an unapproved medication with an approved medication.

2

Anonymous #7 13w

Me when everything has to be the exact same in order for my brain to use pattern recognition.

-2

Anonymous #6 13w

Dawg it’s not big pharma, I’m referencing hundreds of credible studies done by government and private research teams, all corroborating each others’ conclusions. Thats why the approval, or lack thereof, makes it such a different case

15

Anonymous #6 13w

fire burns my arm when i stick it into the fireplace. i now eat all of my food raw

0

Anonymous #7 13w

Ok so reference them right now please! :) cuz you’re not citing a single source

-3

Anonymous #6 13w

big fire is evil and should not be trusted

1

Anonymous #4 13w

Me when I don’t realize how fetal development works

-2

Anonymous #6 13w

You could try using Accutane as an example but the causal relationship between the two became very obvious. This is less clear

1

Anonymous #4 13w

Is Tylenol a necessary asset to life?? Because food is and Tylenol isn’t.

-2

Anonymous #2 13w

Accurate is not a pregnancy approved drug.

-1

Anonymous #2 13w

Accutane*

-1

Anonymous #6 13w

analogy analogy big analogy is bad and should not be trusted

1

Anonymous #6 13w

You can clearly use a phone and type, you do that yourself. I’m not your professor, I don’t need to cite common knowledge facts because you’re too lazy to do the quick research yourself. I’ve also done the work myself already, I don’t see why it’s my responsibility to do it for you as well.

1

Anonymous #6 13w

Erm…do you know what happens when a pregnant woman has a fever that goes untreated? It can absolutely be necessary, even during pregnancy

8

Anonymous #2 13w

Yeah tbh I’d rather have a healthy, non verbal kid than a dead or severely ill one, but maybe that’s just me

2

Anonymous #7 13w

Uhm… taking Tylenol doesn’t prevent u from having a healthy kid but ok… I’m still pro vaccine

0

Anonymous #2 13w

Uhm they recommend women to take it for headaches during pregnancy not just fever

0

Anonymous #6 13w

I’m aware. That’s my point. It can be necessary

1

Anonymous #2 13w

It shouldn’t be taken Willy nilly I don’t think anyone sees my point. Anything can be good if it’s life saving the issue is that people just think it’s safe so they can take it at the smallest chance of pain or headache and that’s not good

1

Anonymous #6 13w

I don’t think the average person does that even when they’re not pregnant. Most people are familiar with Tylenol’s association with liver problems if you take too much

1

Anonymous #2 13w

It’s about fetal development.

1