Anonymous #1 6d

This might actually be a tough case considering there are some studies that link it. The standards for proving defamation in the US are pretty high. Idek if you can sue the government for defamation 💀

5

Anonymous #3 6d

They’re owned by Kenvue, a Johnson and Johnson spinoff. They have money but their legal team is knee-deep in talc lawsuits rn 💀

2

Anonymous #2 6d

an absolute wwe superslam smackdown against the us government would make that a nonissue real fast

1

Anonymous #2 6d

The data shows there’s a correlation between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and neurodevelopmental disorders, which most likely is only bc we understand autism more so there’s more diagnoses and more women take tylenol now bc it’s the only safe option. Tylenol use going up and autism rates going up being correlated doesn’t mean all that much when there’s a billion other factors. So a normal person saying Tylenol causes autism may actually be grounds. But you’re right idk about suing the Gov

21

Anonymous #2 6d

Each subset of companies has their own legal team. There’s enough people to handle it

4

Anonymous #5 6d

They need to look at risks of Zoloft and zofran. A lot of medications interfere with prenatal development, if simple supplements and herbs can fuck with a fetus, why do people trust big pharma so fucking much? Tylenol is the #1 leading cause of cirrhosis of the liver and general liver disease.

5

Anonymous #2 6d

You’re right. My bad.

1

Anonymous #6 6d

Idk if we can compare an unproven link between Tylenol and autism to a definitive link between thalidomide and babies lacking entire limbs

1

Anonymous #7 6d

It’s medicine that was approved for pregnancies later being revealed as bad. There are similarities we shouldn’t just blatantly trust big pharma.

-2

Anonymous #6 6d

Yes, although I don’t think the US ever approved it

11

Anonymous #2 6d

The US did not approve it, which is another reason the two shouldn’t be compared. Tylenol has been thoroughly tested and approved to be safely used during pregnancy.

5

Anonymous #7 6d

There is reason for it to be compared.

0

Anonymous #6 6d

That being?

1

Anonymous #7 6d

I’ve already mentioned it.

-2

Anonymous #6 6d

Right, so what you said was not correct information. It was never approved in the US for use during pregnancy. Unlike Tylenol, which is and has been for years and years. So I guess the use of coloring the two would be to show we should trust approved and rigorously tested medications.

1

Anonymous #7 6d

Comparing*

1

Anonymous #6 6d

FDA already warns against both of these medications

1

Anonymous #7 6d

Who mentioned it being approved by US specifically? It was prescribed to women here however.

-2

Anonymous #7 6d

It’s an example not to trust big pharma.

-1

Anonymous #6 6d

Idk how else to explain to you that you cannot compare an unapproved medication with an approved medication.

2

Anonymous #7 6d

Me when everything has to be the exact same in order for my brain to use pattern recognition.

-2

Anonymous #6 6d

Dawg it’s not big pharma, I’m referencing hundreds of credible studies done by government and private research teams, all corroborating each others’ conclusions. Thats why the approval, or lack thereof, makes it such a different case

15

Anonymous #6 6d

fire burns my arm when i stick it into the fireplace. i now eat all of my food raw

0

Anonymous #7 6d

Ok so reference them right now please! :) cuz you’re not citing a single source

-3

Anonymous #6 6d

big fire is evil and should not be trusted

1

Anonymous #4 6d

Me when I don’t realize how fetal development works

-2

Anonymous #6 6d

You could try using Accutane as an example but the causal relationship between the two became very obvious. This is less clear

1

Anonymous #4 6d

Is Tylenol a necessary asset to life?? Because food is and Tylenol isn’t.

-2

Anonymous #2 6d

Accurate is not a pregnancy approved drug.

-1

Anonymous #2 6d

Accutane*

-1

Anonymous #6 6d

analogy analogy big analogy is bad and should not be trusted

1

Anonymous #6 6d

You can clearly use a phone and type, you do that yourself. I’m not your professor, I don’t need to cite common knowledge facts because you’re too lazy to do the quick research yourself. I’ve also done the work myself already, I don’t see why it’s my responsibility to do it for you as well.

1

Anonymous #6 6d

Erm…do you know what happens when a pregnant woman has a fever that goes untreated? It can absolutely be necessary, even during pregnancy

8

Anonymous #2 6d

Yeah tbh I’d rather have a healthy, non verbal kid than a dead or severely ill one, but maybe that’s just me

2

Anonymous #7 6d

Uhm… taking Tylenol doesn’t prevent u from having a healthy kid but ok… I’m still pro vaccine

0

Anonymous #2 6d

Uhm they recommend women to take it for headaches during pregnancy not just fever

0

Anonymous #6 6d

I’m aware. That’s my point. It can be necessary

1

Anonymous #2 6d

It shouldn’t be taken Willy nilly I don’t think anyone sees my point. Anything can be good if it’s life saving the issue is that people just think it’s safe so they can take it at the smallest chance of pain or headache and that’s not good

1

Anonymous #6 6d

I don’t think the average person does that even when they’re not pregnant. Most people are familiar with Tylenol’s association with liver problems if you take too much

1

Anonymous #2 6d

It’s about fetal development.

1