Anonymous #1 3w

https://www.npr.org/2026/03/02/nx-s1-5718476/supreme-court-guns-marijuana

2

Anonymous OP 3w

LMFAOOOO so that where the “habitual drunkard” comment was from 💀 thank you

4

Anonymous #2 3w

Well we’re not going to take away Hegseth’s guns

27

Anonymous #4 3w

yes, in a way that is scientifically proven to be less dangerous than alcohol

9

Anonymous #5 3w

Yea and eating uranium is safer than plutonium but both are awful, aren’t they.

-2

Anonymous #4 3w

mf alcohol causes cancer and many other diseases, cannabis at worst can cause reversible psychosis symptoms and that’s IF a user has some pre-existing mental condition. I’m in college reading scientific papers about this shit do not try and convince me alcohol and cannabis are remotely close in their potential to harm the body/mind.

5

Anonymous #5 3w

Did I say they were close✌️🙏🥀💔. You’re also forgetting how people consume the cannabis rather than the drug itself. It doesn’t matter *what* you’re smoking most of the time, the act alone is extremely harmful.

-2

Anonymous #4 3w

you did tho

11

Anonymous #4 3w

you compared them to eating uranium and plutonium so yes 😹 and whether smoking itself is harmful is a completely separate issue, there are many ways to enjoy cannabis that do not involve combustion

6

Anonymous #4 3w

the bottom line of why taking away guns from cannabis users is that alcohol use has been linked to an increase in violence, this cannot be said about cannabis, yet nobody is talking about taking away guns from alcohol drinkers. Think demographically about why they might want to specifically restrict people who use cannabis from practicing the 2nd amendment.

6