second part is unproven first part is completely irrelevant

0

Comment Deleted

0

having a gun is not intent to hurt anyone, everyone knows this

3

Comment Deleted

0

it wasnt illegal, those charges were dropped. and once again, possessing a gun, even illegally (which it wasnt), is not intent to hurt anyone. again everyone knows this dawg

1

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

it literally does not matter for if self defense is justified. you can carry illegally and be fully within your legal right to defend yourself with the gun

0

this wasnt vigilantism bud, it was people open carrying outside a business in an open carry state. literally none of this proves anything. not to mention the people he shot were chasing him, trying to hit him with a skateboard, and pulled a gun on him lmfao gtfo

0

Comment Deleted

0

he didnt make someone charge at him, hit him with a skateboard, and pull a gun on him. if someones open carrying and you attack them, youll be shot and killed and no jury on earth is going to convict them lol. idk if this is just a lack of life experience or what

0

Comment Deleted

0

completely and utterly irrelevant to if hes legally and morally justified in defending himself when aggressed upon, which he was by skateboard and gun wielding pedophiles so

-1

Comment Deleted

0

you cant respond to a single point lmao. if you have a gun, LEGALLY OR ILLEGALLY, and someone is trying to kill you, it is your legal and moral right to protect yourself

0

Comment Deleted

0

and heres the loop because you cant respond. i dont get the argument. if you “plan” or “dont plan” thats irrelevant to the fact that if youre standing there minding your own business and someone attacks you you can defend yourself. and if a mob of people is chasing you with guns and skateboards youre also able to defend yourself. he was not the aggressor

-1

Comment Deleted

0

wroooooooong simply false. i see people open carrying in walmart every week doesnt mean theyre aggressing on me and i need to attack them. he was chased by a deranged mentally ill pedo and defended himself. then was chased and hit in the head with a skateboard and had a gun pulled on him. obvious self defense. but if youre just gonna loop back and say the same shit over and over then u got nothing to add dawg

-1

Comment Deleted

0

read this very slowly and dont respond until youre able to actually address it: IT DOES NOT MATTER IF HAVING THE GUN IS LEGAL OR ILLEGAL, WHAT MATTERS IS IF YOUR LIFE IS THREATENED. and no, existing in public (even a protest) with a gun (even ILLEGALLY) is not aggressing on others. much like the guy he shot was not aggressing on others until he decided to pull his gun and point it at dudes head

-1

Anonymous OP 28w

If I show up to a police station with the intent of threatening officers with a gun for some purpose, then the police aim their guns at me and my life is in danger, am I legally allowed to shoot them? I’m not allowed to be inside there with a gun. I’m not allowed to use the gun to threaten people. I showed up to this situation knowing something might happen. And, to that point: if I showed up explicitly to shoot an officer in self defense, is it still self defense?

4

Anonymous #2 28w

a police station is an explicitly no gun zone, so carrying a gun into a police station is going to immediately be taken as a threat. open carrying a gun in public in an open carry state is not taken as an immediate threat, so there needs to be some other act of aggression from the person with the gun for them to be an aggressor. and the intent is irrelevant, all that matters is WHO STARTED IT and no existing in a public space open carrying a gun is not aggressing on people

-1

Comment Deleted

0

quiet piggy you have nothing more to say

0