Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
US Politics icon
US Politics 1w
“If men aren't allowed to have an opinion on abortion, then they shouldn't have to contribute to federal funding of breast cancer research.” - from an incel on X. Men can get breast cancer too you m0r0n
comment

25
upvote 114 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

The worst part is he could’ve went somewhere better with that and went the complete wrong direction

upvote 18 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

I'm pro-choice but I don't get the "men aren't allowed to have an opinion..." line of thought. Since when do we prohibit value judgments on the basis of gender?

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Men are allowed to have an opinion as long as it’s pro-life

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Cancer research is literally the most entrenched form of money laundering

upvote -12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

Who the fuck is forcing you to donate money?

upvote 26 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

bro. Get. A life.

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

Well they can have an opinion but they need to keep it to themselves. They don’t get to decide if the woman is getting an abortion or not.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

i mean i think a man should get a weigh in, IF it's his kid, but ultimately the woman gets the final say, it's her body and she's the one who has to go through 9 months of pregnancy and birth??? i fear this is obvious

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1w

what

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1w

Everyone is gonna weigh in, realistically. If you attack the ability to have a value judgement, rather than the value judgement itself, you're gonna lose most debates, or at least end up at loggerheads. Because you can disprove that it's murder, but you can't disprove that they should be able to speak on an issue. And obviously if it were murder, they'd have a moral imperative to speak and stop as much of it as possible. So that's what you have to attack, the opinion, not the ability to hold it.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

i mean i don't believe that any person outside of the relationship that created the pregnancy should get a say in the decision at all and within the relationship, the woman's decision is ultimate

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1w

No. 👎

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1w

Nope

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

Um if you have nothing to do with the potential baby, why the fuck would you get to have a say? Mind your own business

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Because the charge against abortion is that it ends a human life. If so, that's pertinent to all society. We don't "mind our own business" on cases of murder. The successful counterargument isn't to disallow that value judgement, but to disprove it. Anything else is a waste of breath.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

it's not murder

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

Good news, it’s not murder. You just want to control women’s bodies. Get help you psycho

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

You're clearly not reading anything I've said

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

I did. Still think you’re an idiot

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

If you did, you'd know I don't think it's murder

upvote 1 downvote
🙈
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w
post
upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

you're just kinda going on and on when it seems like we all have the same opinion: it's not murder, therefore anyone outside of the relationship has no right to give their opinion

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1w

It's been like 6 sentences dawg. But all I'm saying is you can't start from that conclusion and work backwards

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

I’m not listening to someone who says “dawg”. Grow up

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

You pick at word choices and call me an idiot psycho. You don't seem able to do much more than that

upvote 1 downvote