Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Anti gunners: There will never be a legitimate hunting purpose for full auto rates of fire The Humble Texan:
Youtube video:
upvote -3 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 11w

If you need all that to kill a wild pig you’re bad at hunting

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 11w

I’m sorry, but wouldn’t it make more sense to go hunting with something with a higher caliber, especially if you’re hunting wild pigs

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11w

Invasive species can be hunted in fun ways

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

I guess if your definition of fun is handicapped

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11w

Unironically I don't think using thermals and full auto rates of fire is a handicap

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11w

If anything I'd say its only fair to do this in cases of invasive species or predatory animals that have acclimated to humans

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

Which to be clear are both still legitimate hunting purposes

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 11w

Yeah true the 22 is a bit fucked up

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

No I’m saying you’re handicapped and thermal and full auto helps you overcome that

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11w

I don't even own thermals or a full auto lol

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

Then why the fuck are you bitching and moaning about how there’s actually a super legit purpose for them when ur hunting

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11w

I'm not hunting invasive species or predatory animals acclimated to humans

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11w

I plan to do this in Texas at some point though and don't want to see it done away with because of pearl clutching

upvote 1 downvote