Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
How does the left have such an anti 2A crowd when they historically have the support of marginalized communities across the nation? Like you’re marginalized! YOU should be the one that’s armed! ITS THE WHOLE POINT OF IT!!!
upvote 9 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

the 2A thing is the biggest larp losers on both sides of the spectrum love to engage in

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Because in practice, the 2nd amendment does nothing to protect marginalized groups while exposing everybody to higher rates of gun violence.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

I think a solid number of leftists aren’t so much anti 2a as much as they are “literally anything needs to change bc people keep dying to a problem that only we have”

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

FOR SUUURE! Like there’s definitely common ground there. Conservatives are tired of the wrong people getting guns and making every gun owner look bad, the left doesn’t want the wrong mentally ill people getting the fucking things either. Banning them isn’t going to work (we have too many in circulation) and clearly just letting everyone have everything isn’t going to work either.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

‘conservatives are tired of the wrong people getting guns’ is so fucking bullshit. rightoids get their panties in a twist when you even think about suggesting any form of fucking gun control.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

and if anything the extreme prevalence of firearms that exists as a result of the 2nd amendment has enabled/legitimized law enforcement killing people of color at disproportionate rates

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

Those are the losers we’re talking about. I worked at a gun range that obviously had a more conservative background. I saw plenty of people who are conservatives refuse service to people that were disturbed and supported background checks. Any sensible person will agree that not everyone should have a firearm.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

so then explain why we don’t have gun control, because it’s certainly not the left’s inaction

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

Then maybe you should vote for people who actually want gun control, instead of voting for NRA puppets.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

When did I ever say who I voted for?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

to be clear I’m not trying to say there aren’t conservatives who support common sense gun control measures like universal background checks, but the NRA’s co-opting of conservative politics to maximize profit for firearm companies is disgusting and principled conservatives should vocally oppose it

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

I agree, but let’s remember when Obama tried to pass gun control measures years ago but even with the Democratic Party in congress there wasn’t a full agreement on it with some democrats not even showing to vote after the Sandy Hook Tragedy.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

i don’t put much stock in a single instance of dems not passing gun control, it’s deeply disappointing, but it doesn’t exonerate the right. personally, i hate centrist party line dems because of their inaction. overwhelmingly the opposition and obstructionist behavior towards gun control has originated on the right, which imo places the vast majority of culpability for the continuing epidemic of gun violence with the GOP.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

Explain how it does nothing to protect marginalized people?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

We have one of the highest rates of gun violence in the world, and black people are the most likely to be victims of gun violence.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

They’re also more likely to be the perpetrators within those same communities. So should we go and disarm those communities?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

No, I’m pointing out that the second amendment ist protecting marginalized communities. It’s exposing them to higher levels of violence and crime.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

Is it the second amendment or what the federal government has done to these communities to cause such rampant crime and shattered family dynamics?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

Not to mention that you can find pictures of the Black Panther party carrying fire arms on them during protests.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

No, it’s the second amendment. Other countries have poor marginalized communities too, but they don’t have the gun deaths.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

Oh so Palestine doesn’t?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

lol what are you even talking about at this point? Palestine isn’t suffering from high gun crime, they’re being invaded by a foreign military. Those two things aren’t remotely comparable.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

Well maybe they wouldn’t have so many deaths if their citizens were better armed to deal with foreign threats. Afghanistan armed their population and kicked multiple empires off of their territory. Why can’t Palestine?

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

I’m sorry is your argument genuinely that Palestine should have just “gotten weapons”? Because there’s been a whole lot of work done via US influence campaigns at the behest of Israel, and direct actions by Israel that explicitly restrict weapons entering Gaza. “Just arm yourself” doesn’t fucking work when an occupying force is controlling the flow of almost all goods in and out of your land. Get fucking real.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

These are literally things that the second amendment is there to protect people against. But if you wanna be disarmed by the same government you don’t trust then by all means give them your guns. You’ll be contributing towards genocide like the rest of the government, they’ll send those weapons overseas to used to kill more people.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

brother the government can and will disarm you if they want to, regardless of whatever weaponry you have. also, can you cite a single source for the government sending confiscated weapons overseas in any significant number, or disarming the populace in any significant number?

upvote 3 downvote