Anonymous #8 3w

That’s the other thing, she didn’t properly cite anything. Like that’s literally plagerism and you expect not to get a zero? In college?

62

Anonymous just_peachy_ 3w

Exactly. she got a 0 because the quality of her work deserved a 0. not bc she’s a christian conservative. They just love crying and playing the victim card

44

Anonymous #7 3w

Nope. We shouldn’t and wouldn’t coddle flat earthers feelings by dancing around the true shape of the Earth in a science class. Atheist education.

10

That it’s a social construct and distinct from biological sex? Yes.

15

Anonymous OP 3w

#1 really thought they got ya lmao

21

Nope, it’s well established that gender describes the social constructs we ascribe to the sexes. Not about feelings it’s just correct.

36

gender is scientifically defined as: "a social and cultural construct that includes the roles, behaviors, and identities a society associates with being male or female" so it's actually not protecting anyone's feelings, facts don't care about your feelings :)

27

Gender isn’t a religious concept but a societal concept so that point doesn’t matter… but great work I can tell you’re acing your whataboutism class (clearly that’s the only one you’re passing too)

19

Christianity Bible stories aren’t facts babe. They’re under the mythology section of a book store for a reason. You wouldn’t put the hunger games in the history section

19

refer to the comment i made regarding facts

8

your reading comprehension is quite lackluster my friend

9

Exactly. You’re literally disproving your own point. Nobody knows if it’s true or not, and there is no way to prove it without some kind of bs circular reasoning. There’s a difference between that and proven, researched facts, like the well known and documented difference between biological sex and gender identity

14

How are you in college?

12

Anonymous OP 3w

that's still secular m'love

3

It’s not feelings it’s just a fact gender is a social construct

6

Are you talking about being trans? Dude… gender is a social construct while sex is not. Please dear Gods read a book.

8

Anonymous #7 3w

Nope. I want it taught explicitly that god does not exist. Not just the absence of religion.

8

The theory of evolution, and the big bang theory.

3

The Big Bang? Pretty obvious

5

That’s exactly what yall do with the Bible… there’s no evidence of any of it actually happening but you teach it like it’s the truth with facts backing it up anyways.

9

“Theory” in scientific terms means our fully evidence based model of a system. “The theory of gravity” ring a bell? You going deny that next?

6

The irony is wild lmao

4

Bad bait lol. You believe god created people out of dirt lmao

6

Also humans are animals lol. We are a type of animal

6

lol, lmao

10

I would say I don’t believe in any of it myself, but I have nothing against those who do believe in it. I think trying to use your religion as objective proof of anything is just about the most ridiculous thing you can do. The difference between the divine creation theory and the big bang is that the latter is evidenced by natural phenomena every day, it makes the most sense with the facts. The only “proof” of the former is a book written by some randos a couple thousand years ago

11

I mean it was technically something. All the mass in the universe condensed into a single point of infinite density, the only known “naked” singularity. Same concept as a black hole but without the whole event horizon and everything around it. The most likely theory imo is that the whole thing is a cycle, so with enough time everything will get sucked back into that single point and explode all over again, so it didn’t just come from nowhere either. Which is evidenced by the slowing expansion of

4

Anonymous perry_theplatypus 3w

the universe

6

Like I said, it’s not 100% proven because obviously we weren’t there. I’m telling you the prevailing theory based on our understanding of the physical laws of our universe and its expansion. Did you see your God create everything?

13

You can see the bones of these intermediate species and we can date them using physics!! It’s pretty fascinating stuff. You can do it yourself if you apply to the right research groups! :)

14

science legitimately exists on factual data, empirical testing and all, your opinion doesn't change that bud

9

According to the proven facts that back it up lmao what

1

???? Nature??? The people whose entire job is dedicated to formulating complex proofs and doing research to understand things better? Like what even kinda question is that. Facts are just facts dude, and they’re backed by evidence

9

are you in college? do you know what empirical means? repeatedly testing and finding similar results based on evidence

6

These “facts” are “verified” by literally millions of researchers across the world. Peaople have different scientific theories about what we don’t know, absolutely. But one of the hallmarks of science is if the results are replicable. If an independent researcher cannot come to the same conclusions as one scientist does using the same methods, then that idea comes into doubt. If, however, they can replicate it, then more and more people can rely on that scientific belief as more verify it

9

What you’re showcasing is a severe distrust of science, which is understandable. The line between science and politics is often muddled in popular media these days. I assure you though, the scientific method is made in a way that personal bias, belief, religion, etc do not impact results.

13

Anonymous #5 3w

honestly this level of delusion is not understandable at all from someone who is apparently in college, it is highly concerning

7

Anonymous #11 3w

I mean it’s def just bait, no chance somebody actually managed to make it into college without knowing what a fact is lmao

3

Anonymous perry_theplatypus 3w

i hope so lol but people that are genuinely this stupid do exist so you never know

8

That’s a really sad and narrow minded way to live dawg, believing that everything that doesn’t agree with your worldview has to be made up. How have you made it this far in education??

5

Anonymous #11 3w

It is if you primarily consume anti science rhetoric, which is commonplace in Christianity these days :/ Which is such a shame. Literally throughout the entirety of the Middle Ages the church was a bastion for science

15

That’s why you read the scientific journals yourself silly 🤪

9

once again i ask, are you even in college? because if you are you are clearly not getting your moneys worth. the entire peer review cycle exists to eliminate biases.

12

It’s moreso that the two aren’t mutually exclusive despite what modern talking points suggest

10

Anonymous #5 3w

omfg HAHA

13

Anonymous #5 3w

Wait that’s actually so funny lmao

9