
Charlie Kirk to me was the gate to alt-right conservatism. To most sympathetic to him he was just a Christian spreading his views who was smart. If he was so smart then why was his examples to why he didn’t like DEI programs use black people all the time? Why when in his final moments was he changing the subject from school shooters which by demographics is a cis white person problem to trans and marginalized communities?
I think my stance has softened a little from thinking he deserved it to just thinking he doesn’t deserve any sympathy. He was a massive bigot and a mouthpiece for some of the most harmful and morally repugnant ideologies known to man. I’ll admit that I don’t think his death solved anything but you won’t find me crying over someone who wanted me and all my loved ones dead.
To answer the last question, I’m pretty sure it was the guy asking the question who was changing it all. And for dei, because that’s kind of where it stemmed from. The whole thing was black people weren’t getting jobs because they had black sounding names. That was what he disagreed with
No. Charlie was doing his best to not talk about school shootings; unfortunately he was saved from answering that debate. Charlie was spouting nonsense about it being a trans problem and the person he was debating was clearly ready for it. Then he went to “gang violence” which is changing the subject if you are talking about school shootings. And no, that’s not true. He has spread misinformation about DEI such as the Airline training debacle.
He also flamed Ms. Rachel for being a Christian and talking about standing with queer people during pride month, and using specifically Matthew and the New Testament and the new Covenant. Charlie Kirk criticizes her saying Satan also used scripture and then USED AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT VERSE OF THE BIBLE in the Old Testament/ Old covenant as “her quote” and said that stoning gay people is part of Gods perfect law. This is an incredibly dishonest response, at best. Why did they respond to that one?
The difference is Nazis were actively trying to murder jews if they saw them. Has Charlie Kirk ever expressed wanting to commit ANY sort of violence against anybody who is transgender? If you want I can send video of him talking to trans people and show how not violent he was
I’ve never heard Charlie say they should stone gay people in his party? In fact he previously said that gay people should be welcomed into the Conservative Party? And yet when someone else says they will stand with them, this is the response? Even his legacy (TPUSA) just likely got a teacher fired (the teacher is on leave) for the most fuck ass paper I have ever seen. I fucking hate writing and I would still not have even thought to turn something like that in and expect credit at Oral Robert’s.
Im mentally ill as shit. I got Severe PTSD, Severe CPTSD, I got ADHD, Autism, Dyscalculia, Depression and Anxiety, but none of that shit relates to me liking to dress androgynously. But also isn’t it sane to not want someone to exist if they’re calling for your non-existence? Tolerance of paradox don’t like bigotry.
Charlie was grifter and a political tool to get alienated white men and conservative leaning people (mainly Christian’s) to the MAGA party line. Everyone that is so sad he died was either Nondenominational/Evangelical Christian or an alienated white man or both. He couldn’t say anything too horrible or he’d lose base but he needed enough to sow the seeds of anger and bitterness and to stir up prejudices. He was not a “wholesome Christian man”.
Of course you’re the type of idiot to overuse genocide and cheapen what an actual genocide is. The second there is a systematic unaliving of trans people (made legal by the US) then you can call it a genocide and call me an idiot. But until then, you’re just an overdramatic privileged asshole. Stfu and get a life.
Genocide is the deliberate destruction, in whole or in part, of a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, and involves acts such as killing, causing serious harm, imposing conditions calculated to destroy the group, preventing births, or forcibly transferring children. Note that my point that I fucked up to say was how do you think a genocide starts? People wake up and say ah yeah I’m just gonna start blasting this group?
If you continue to scapegoat groups of people for the problems of a society, dehumanizing them, and taking away rights and liberties, a possible genocide can occur. We are arguing that Charlie Kirk is “gently putting gasoline” against trans people so there can later be fire whether that be genocide or not.
Yeah way too wordy. Genocide is trying to eradicate a certain group. If I have a rat infestation, and I kill all the rats in my house, not a genocide. If I then go and attempt to eradicate every single rat on the planet then yes that’s a genocide. You can’t legit cause one of the biggest terrorist attacks of all time and then go “they’re committing a genocide against us” that’s not how that works
I literally just said this. But you can’t hold an argument, so the moment I bring in actual evidence you try and paint ME as invalid instead of my argument. I may have PTSD and shit but even with a brain like mine you can’t fill your dead debate bro’s bloody shoes. Stick to the topic next time, the last thing Charlie ever did was change it to avoid talking about something he knew he was wrong about too. Admit defeat like a fucking man instead of trying to say I’m crazy.
The Lehi aka The Stern Gang aka the Fighters For The Freedom of Israel (ig they couldn’t decide on a name). The Lehi, Irgun, and Haganah (all Zionist terrorist groups) would be merged into the IDF come the formation of the state of Israel. The Lehi attempted to ally with Nazi germany as wwii was going on This is historical fact and the information is easily accessible online.