Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Why do you think Charlie Kirk “deserved it”
upvote 4 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

I got a whole song about that

post
upvote 18 downvote
😎
Anonymous 3w

Charlie Kirk to me was the gate to alt-right conservatism. To most sympathetic to him he was just a Christian spreading his views who was smart. If he was so smart then why was his examples to why he didn’t like DEI programs use black people all the time? Why when in his final moments was he changing the subject from school shooters which by demographics is a cis white person problem to trans and marginalized communities?

upvote 15 downvote
🍔
Anonymous 3w

I think my stance has softened a little from thinking he deserved it to just thinking he doesn’t deserve any sympathy. He was a massive bigot and a mouthpiece for some of the most harmful and morally repugnant ideologies known to man. I’ll admit that I don’t think his death solved anything but you won’t find me crying over someone who wanted me and all my loved ones dead.

upvote 12 downvote
🪣
Anonymous 3w

I don’t think he deserved it I just don’t care nor show any sympathy to that sack of shit

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

I don’t think he did, he was a good man, I just disagreed with his veiws

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> cheesepussy 3w

Wait how did he want you and your loved ones dead? Hes a lot of things yes, but wanting you and your loved ones dead?

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

….you wrote a song as to why Charlie Kirk deserved to be killed?

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

It was finished before he was even declared dead, it was wishful thinking.

upvote 23 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

….thats even worse

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I mean he called me, my girlfriend, and my friends throbbing middle fingers to his god, Im pretty sure he didn’t want us to exist either. Sooo… fuck ‘em.

upvote 19 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

When did he say that?

upvote -3 downvote
🍑
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I mean he literally said that transgenderism should be eradicated. Like just blatantly genocidal language attacking people like my friends and myself

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w
post
upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> brattybottom51 3w

To answer the last question, I’m pretty sure it was the guy asking the question who was changing it all. And for dei, because that’s kind of where it stemmed from. The whole thing was black people weren’t getting jobs because they had black sounding names. That was what he disagreed with

upvote -3 downvote
🍑
Anonymous replying to -> just_peachy_ 3w

“Guys the nazis said their problem was with Judaism, not Jewish people. Two totally different things”

post
upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> just_peachy_ 3w

Transgenderism is not a religion lol

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> just_peachy_ 3w

Charlie is nowhere near a Nazi, the only real Nazis are Nick Fuentes and their crew

upvote 1 downvote
😎
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

No. Charlie was doing his best to not talk about school shootings; unfortunately he was saved from answering that debate. Charlie was spouting nonsense about it being a trans problem and the person he was debating was clearly ready for it. Then he went to “gang violence” which is changing the subject if you are talking about school shootings. And no, that’s not true. He has spread misinformation about DEI such as the Airline training debacle.

upvote 17 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Your literally proving his point that trans people are mentally ill

upvote -3 downvote
😎
Anonymous replying to -> brattybottom51 3w

He also flamed Ms. Rachel for being a Christian and talking about standing with queer people during pride month, and using specifically Matthew and the New Testament and the new Covenant. Charlie Kirk criticizes her saying Satan also used scripture and then USED AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT VERSE OF THE BIBLE in the Old Testament/ Old covenant as “her quote” and said that stoning gay people is part of Gods perfect law. This is an incredibly dishonest response, at best. Why did they respond to that one?

upvote 2 downvote
🍑
Anonymous replying to -> #8 3w

Where did I say it was a religion? I’m simply pointing out that attacking an identity is often an underhanded way of attacking a group of people

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> just_peachy_ 3w

The difference is Nazis were actively trying to murder jews if they saw them. Has Charlie Kirk ever expressed wanting to commit ANY sort of violence against anybody who is transgender? If you want I can send video of him talking to trans people and show how not violent he was

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 3w

Agreed

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> just_peachy_ 3w

But also show me this quote

upvote -1 downvote
😎
Anonymous replying to -> brattybottom51 3w

I’ve never heard Charlie say they should stone gay people in his party? In fact he previously said that gay people should be welcomed into the Conservative Party? And yet when someone else says they will stand with them, this is the response? Even his legacy (TPUSA) just likely got a teacher fired (the teacher is on leave) for the most fuck ass paper I have ever seen. I fucking hate writing and I would still not have even thought to turn something like that in and expect credit at Oral Robert’s.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 3w

Im mentally ill as shit. I got Severe PTSD, Severe CPTSD, I got ADHD, Autism, Dyscalculia, Depression and Anxiety, but none of that shit relates to me liking to dress androgynously. But also isn’t it sane to not want someone to exist if they’re calling for your non-existence? Tolerance of paradox don’t like bigotry.

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Pick a struggle

upvote -4 downvote
😎
Anonymous replying to -> brattybottom51 3w

Charlie was grifter and a political tool to get alienated white men and conservative leaning people (mainly Christian’s) to the MAGA party line. Everyone that is so sad he died was either Nondenominational/Evangelical Christian or an alienated white man or both. He couldn’t say anything too horrible or he’d lose base but he needed enough to sow the seeds of anger and bitterness and to stir up prejudices. He was not a “wholesome Christian man”.

upvote 6 downvote
🍔
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Of course you’re the type of idiot who thinks genocide starts with blatant acts and not hateful rhetoric with at least some degree of subtlety

upvote 13 downvote
🍔
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

“He talked to trans people without killing them so he was a good guy” Jesus Christ lol

upvote 13 downvote
🍑
Anonymous replying to -> cheesepussy 3w

Yeah also totally forgetting all the times Kirk never condemned violence against trans people. He would basically just be like “yeah they had it coming, what do you expect”

upvote 12 downvote
🍔
Anonymous replying to -> #8 3w

There’s no way you actually disagree with his views with any backbone and still think he was a good person

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

He is not calling for your non existence

upvote -2 downvote
😎
Anonymous replying to -> #8 3w

We should have “just took care of” trans people like we did in the 1950-60s real Charlie Kirk quote (paraphrase technically but)

upvote 12 downvote
😎
Anonymous replying to -> brattybottom51 3w

https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1635720421617340416

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> just_peachy_ 3w

When did he say that?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> cheesepussy 3w

Of course you’re the type of idiot to overuse genocide and cheapen what an actual genocide is. The second there is a systematic unaliving of trans people (made legal by the US) then you can call it a genocide and call me an idiot. But until then, you’re just an overdramatic privileged asshole. Stfu and get a life.

upvote -1 downvote
😎
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

how do you think the Genocide in Gaza? Also cheesepussy never said anything about a current genocide.

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> brattybottom51 3w

Ok define genocide for me

upvote 0 downvote
😎
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Genocide is the deliberate destruction, in whole or in part, of a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, and involves acts such as killing, causing serious harm, imposing conditions calculated to destroy the group, preventing births, or forcibly transferring children. Note that my point that I fucked up to say was how do you think a genocide starts? People wake up and say ah yeah I’m just gonna start blasting this group?

upvote 3 downvote
😎
Anonymous replying to -> brattybottom51 3w

If you continue to scapegoat groups of people for the problems of a society, dehumanizing them, and taking away rights and liberties, a possible genocide can occur. We are arguing that Charlie Kirk is “gently putting gasoline” against trans people so there can later be fire whether that be genocide or not.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> brattybottom51 3w

Yeah way too wordy. Genocide is trying to eradicate a certain group. If I have a rat infestation, and I kill all the rats in my house, not a genocide. If I then go and attempt to eradicate every single rat on the planet then yes that’s a genocide. You can’t legit cause one of the biggest terrorist attacks of all time and then go “they’re committing a genocide against us” that’s not how that works

upvote 0 downvote
🍔
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

You know the genocide in Palestine didn’t start with October 7th, right? Never mind, of course you don’t.

upvote 6 downvote
🍔
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Also you can’t just reject a definition for being “too wordy” when it’s literally the official definition recognized by authorities on the subject

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> cheesepussy 3w

Bro if it was a genocide, it would’ve already been done dumbass. What genocide does population grow

upvote 0 downvote
🪣
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I can tell you haven’t learned anything from the Holocaust

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I mean hey it’s great songwriting material. Plus at least one of my struggles ain’t being a bigoted little loser, that would’ve been a real pain in the neck.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> just_a_bucket 3w

Actually I learned so much from the Holocaust that I believe it is crucial for Jews to have their own country to protect themselves from another Holocaust

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Yeahhhh you’re very mentally ill

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I literally just said this. But you can’t hold an argument, so the moment I bring in actual evidence you try and paint ME as invalid instead of my argument. I may have PTSD and shit but even with a brain like mine you can’t fill your dead debate bro’s bloody shoes. Stick to the topic next time, the last thing Charlie ever did was change it to avoid talking about something he knew he was wrong about too. Admit defeat like a fucking man instead of trying to say I’m crazy.

upvote 5 downvote
🍑
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Yeah ignore the fact that Zionist groups operating within Palestine in the 1940’s tried to ally with the nazis. Oh also said groups would later go on to become the IDF

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> just_peachy_ 3w

Hahahahahah source? That’s some nazi rhetoric frrrrrr

upvote 0 downvote
🍑
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

The Lehi aka The Stern Gang aka the Fighters For The Freedom of Israel (ig they couldn’t decide on a name). The Lehi, Irgun, and Haganah (all Zionist terrorist groups) would be merged into the IDF come the formation of the state of Israel. The Lehi attempted to ally with Nazi germany as wwii was going on This is historical fact and the information is easily accessible online.

upvote 4 downvote