Anonymous #1 18w

That's very unrealistic standards

-4

Anonymous OP 18w

It's within belief the guy thinks she is trying to hit him and run

-3

Anonymous OP 18w

for their line of work, no it isn’t.

22

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 18w

Yes it is bro. Even if you don't think she hit him she barely misses him at the very best. (most reports say he was hit with the mirror) Acting in a split second to that most people would shoot including law enforcement.

-4

Anonymous OP 18w

Then he should take the hit. He is a public servant. Also he should be smart enough to not stand infront of a running car.

14

Anonymous OP 18w

ah yes, the logical decision when a vehicle MIGHT hit you: shoot the driver 3 times instead of getting out of the fucking way to better assess the situation.

5

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 18w

The vehicle did in fact hit him and yes that's pretty logical

0

Anonymous #1 18w

He should take a hit.... uh huh

0

Anonymous OP 18w

yeah it brushed him at best. he wasn’t run over, and he wasn’t injured. maybe if he hadn’t been so busy trying to pull his weapon it wouldn’t have even brushed him.

6

Anonymous thefuckingfbi 18w

He moved She would have hit him man please

-2

Anonymous OP 18w

Yes. His job is to put his life on the line for the public and if he can’t do that he isn’t suited for duty. He stood in front of the vehicle knowing full well what could happen.

16

Anonymous OP 18w

she didn’t fuckin hit him?? all he had to do was take a step back, not mag dump a mother??

6

Anonymous #1 18w

are you actually dumb his job isn't to take a hit from a car because some dumb lib is protesting him doing his job

-3

Idk even know how can i explain this to you so it makes sense

-2

Anonymous OP 18w

right so he should act as the judge jury and executioner and murder her instead right? that sounds perfectly logical instead of simply stepping out of the way. even if she had been obstructing, the penalty ISNT DEATH.

1

Anonymous OP 18w

She wasn’t protesting, we have confirmation of that from her family and friends. Ironic you call her dumb when he’s standing infront of a running car.

10

Anonymous #1 18w

She was blocking the road from them leaving

1

Anonymous OP 18w

The initial aggressor loses their right to the claim of self defense. Standing in front of that car and blocking it meets the criteria for being the instigator

5

Anonymous OP 18w

She waved them past, several other ice vehicles had already passed her. For the crowd that loved to say do your research you hate doing research.

6

Anonymous #1 18w

She's being interrogated she can't flee bro what

0

Anonymous #1 18w

try waving off a police officer next time you get pulled over

0

i mean if you are federal agent sure

0

Anonymous OP 18w

She let multiple ice vehicles pass before their douchebag stopped and got in her face. He instigated it with no grounds of suspicion

5

Anonymous OP 18w

He walked away and then fled the scene. It is not conceivable he believed she was trying to hit him and even if it was it was unacceptable.

5

Anonymous OP 18w

Maybe he shouldn’t stand in front of cars on the street?

12

Anonymous OP 18w

What reasonable, articulable suspicion caused them to interrogate her?

9

Anonymous #7 18w

She was clearly committing traffic violations. Before you say it, yes thats no reason to pull out a gun but let’s not get carried away and say there was no reason to detain her.

0

Anonymous #8 18w

They can’t conduct a stop for a traffic violation. 8 USC 1357

12

Anonymous #7 18w

They aren't

0

Anonymous #8 18w

Was she? What traffic violation and please let us know what information you used to reach that conclusion

6

Anonymous OP 18w

They aren’t what?

1

Anonymous #7 18w

stopping her for a traffic violation

1

Anonymous OP 18w

It was not a traffic violation, the agent who tried to grab in her car was directing her vehicle as he had with several others. He only attacked her

1

Anonymous OP 18w

Ok, so what was the crime they have suspicion that she committed or was about to commit?

4

Anonymous #6 18w

I think the one who fired shots was different from the one who grabbed the driver’s side handle

1