Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
fun fact: people who live on/nearest to a golf course oftentimes will have ~10 years less than the regional life expectancy, when compared with people miles away from the same golf course.
Shit that should be illegal: 1. Golf courses 2. Private ownership of anything over $1M 3. Public/online support of the far right 4. Refusing vaccines 5. The border 6. Hate speech
upvote 26 downvote

🏴‍☠️
Anonymous 8w

If true, it’d be like the horse statistic all over again.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 8w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 8w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

I want it too - gotta send it to some people

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

so here’s one about Parkinson’s Disease which typically reduces life expectancy ~7 years at age 65 (Dommershuijsen et al. 2020) B. Krzyzanowski et al. “Proximity to Golf Courses and Risk of Parkinson Disease” JAMA Netw Open. 2025. there’s also another one of the health effects of golf courses Kim, G. “Analysis of Enviro and Health Effects of Pesticides on Golf Courses” IJASIS. 2026.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

Life expectancy is overall age, not remaining years

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 8w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

i found this one while collecting the articles that i’ve chatted with coworkers about… and it’s 30 years old which is usually not reliable but in this case kinda spooky as fuck. granted, this is for people who work on property but… still yikes. Kris’s, B.C. “Proportionate mortality study of golf course superintendents” AJIM, 1996.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

fuckin autocorrect. the author’s last name is KROSS

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

well the ellipses indicates the word “approximate” but i’ll admit that was a high-end approximation so thankfully i’m not submitting for a research paper here. either way… if Parkinson’s disease is being linked to proximity to golf courses’ use of pesticides (Krzyzanowski et al. 2025) plus proximity to industrial areas’ heavy metals (Rybicki et al. 1993), then I subsequently link how PD impacts their life expectancy, I’d say that’s a pretty academic association tbh. Let me know though!

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> ireallylikepancakes 8w

i might regret asking but what’s the horse statistic

upvote 9 downvote
🏴‍☠️
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

It’s not that bad. It’s an example of correlation ≠ causation. The idea is that people with horses experience less long term health problems. Causation would tell you that horses improve mental health. In actuality, it’s more likely that people with horses can afford therapy.

upvote 4 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> ireallylikepancakes 8w

Also horses require physical labor to maintain, thus creating a healthier body.

upvote 1 downvote