Anonymous #1 6d

When Hamas shoots their own agents whether attempting to “steal” their own property (aid given to civvies) or their approved press agents, or send their children in vests to the market, then I would argue that this “defense”, deserves overwhelming, crushing violence. The IDF However, the whole country, sent their sons & daughters into harm’s way to rescue their brothers and sisters & to protect the children of their enemies.

-10

Anonymous OP 6d

A whole lotta protecting they’re doing with that I mean seriously great job to them

28

Anonymous OP 6d

This was 3 days ago.

25

Anonymous OP 6d

That’s the thing about war crimes, one group committing them doesn’t give a nation the right to commit them

23

Anonymous #1 6d

The Guardian? Seriously? The same people who suggested Travis Kelcy & Taylor swift were secretly siblings and rape baby’s of bush and pelosi?!

-7

Anonymous OP 6d

Better than Fox News who said Putin was manly for riding a motorcycle shirtless and how Obama humiliated America by riding a bicycle with a helmet

21

Anonymous #3 6d

The scope of the action is legal. There wouldn’t be a war if Hamas didn’t attack(unprovoked) . There wouldn’t be a continuation of that war if the invaders didn’t kidnap and commit unspeakable atrocities to those on the ground and the kidnapped.

-6

Anonymous OP 6d

>unprovoked Lmfao yall are so stupid

25

Anonymous #2 6d

Pls, clarify your meaning

-3

Anonymous OP 6d

Saying that Hamas has been unprovoked is blatantly ignoring the entire history of the state of Israel

29

Anonymous #2 6d

Zionists understand international law about as well as they understand Palestinian history. They don’t.

32

Anonymous OP 6d

Saying it isn’t a genocide is denying objective reality.

11

Anonymous #2 6d

OP rn

10

Anonymous #3 6d

No, but it does give that nation a right to defend itself and its people and if barbarians take them, they have a right to return them.

-5

Anonymous OP 6d

>barbarians Having an IQ in the 70s a requirement for being a Zionist at this point.

13

Anonymous OP 6d

We’re talking about Israel and Palestine not Ancient Rome

16

Anonymous #3 6d

Fox News is of the Uniparty. I don’t back my claims with Uniparty grule

-2

Anonymous #4 6d

There is no such thing as Palestinian history justifying the slaughter, rape, And immolation of families and babies in cribs on the 6th & 7th.

-1

Anonymous OP 6d

Why do you lie? What possesses you to lie in favor of genocide?

15

Anonymous OP 6d

Shit you’re right my bad. Better than Nick Fuentes who said murdering babies is fine if it’s god commanded and that rape is fine too unless it’s babies

7

Anonymous #2 6d

No argument of truth so you spoil your pants, throw them at me and call me stupid?!

-1

Anonymous #3 6d

When was that brought up

-1

Anonymous #3 6d

What

-1

Anonymous OP 6d

Reality agrees with me and shows the truth that it’s a genocide If reality is doing my job, I might as well just insult liars with room temp IQs.

2

Anonymous #2 6d

Valid af. Just like Neonazis, if you deny facts, you deserve insults.

5

Anonymous #4 6d

Honestly the perfect comparison. These people really are just like Neo-Nazis. Falling for lies and propaganda while supporting slaughter and genocide.

6

Anonymous OP 6d

I was just assuming you’re a groyper, if not ignore the Nick Fuentes thing. If you are, it was in a livestream where he was trying to defend Israel’s actions in Palestine by saying they’re being commanded by god and the Bible has precedent of god commanding the killing of babies Then the person he was debating fought back and brought up rape, and Nick was trying to defend himself by saying “What you’d rather have someone rape a baby than kill it??”

9

Anonymous #2 6d

O, please enlighten me as to how the initiation of war, burning of children and kidnapping, torture, and massacres was somehow a provoked action and justified none the less. One cannot initiate an action and say it was provoked, but your welcome to try and square that circle

-1

Anonymous #2 6d

What genocide

-2

Anonymous OP 6d

Please stop typing like an anime villain dog you just continue to prove how low iq you genocide deniers are

3

Anonymous #3 6d

Please, If you are going to argue, state something factual, or back up a claim with something factual and we can proceed. We’ve already established there is no genocide. Please proceed with something logical and factual.

-3

Anonymous OP 6d

Whataboutism is all Zionists have

8

Anonymous OP 6d

You’ve denied a genocide We, alongside reality, have established there is one. And you’ve yet to show how it isn’t one.

5

Anonymous OP 6d

Idk how you’ve concluded that we’ve established there isn’t a genocide. You’re the only one convinced of that

5

Anonymous OP 6d

You’ve still yet to prove how it isn’t a genocide. Don’t lie about intent either. We know Israel has intent through their actions and the statements of their politicians.

5

Anonymous #4 6d

This was his argument. Pack it up boys. He lost this debate to objective reality.

5

Anonymous #4 6d

I cannot favor something which does not exist. I have said this time again on this platform. I can merely correct the incorrect, Nor do I miss guide you. “Do not place a stumbling block in your brother‘s path“ (no matter how wayward or clouded or covered in mud his eyes are. ) now, if you have your irrefutable proof, I am more than happy to clear the log frommine own eyes.

0

Anonymous #4 6d

THESE PEOPLE ARE SO STUPID LMFAO

3

Anonymous OP 6d

Fun way to not address any point lmfao Sorry you love genocide so much you need to lie about it online. You really should get some help. Consider therapy.

5

Anonymous #3 6d

Thank you. That buffoon should be dragged in front of a tribunal. I’ve said no such thing nor will I ever.

-1

Anonymous OP 6d

Denying the genocide in Gaza is just as bad. Hopefully you’ll be at the tribunal with him.

6

Anonymous #4 6d

Praying for the only justified sentence 🙏

5

Anonymous #2 6d

In what actions prove this genocide, against whom?

-1

Anonymous #2 6d

Oh yes, the Jew and the Nazi. Famous friends.

-1

Anonymous #4 6d

Oh yes. If I just spook you wrong, then your feelings, overrule mine, and your insults, prove your argument, even in stating your falsehoods, stating that they are falsehoods, you are correct because you feel it so.

-1

Anonymous OP 6d

Don’t conflate genocide denial with Judaism you antisemite

3

Anonymous #3 6d

What an awful thing.

-1

Anonymous OP 6d

Genocide denial is awful.

6

Anonymous #4 6d

Yeah, OK, when faced with irrefutable proof against one’s position, hold their own refuse. If you keep pushing propaganda and talking points, and hurtling insults at me, even if you say you’re wrong, if you feel hard enough, really set the emotional tone, maybe I’ll believe you.

0

Anonymous xi.jinping 6d

Says the man who brought up “Palestinian history” to justify the atrocities of early October

0

Anonymous OP 6d

You aren’t disagreeing with me. You are disagreeing with reality.

6

Anonymous OP 6d

Denying Palestinian history is psychopathic tbh. I wonder why Zionists think racism is okay.

3

Anonymous #4 6d

They have interest in defending their citizens and getting the ones back who were stolen as well as ensuring such an attack on their state cannot continue. This is well within the United Nations definition of defensive war. They have bent over backwards to follow an organization which no one else does. Nor do they have any power yet Israel follows them anyway.

-2

Anonymous OP 6d

That was your best argument, seriously? That it fits a defensive war? It fits the genocide much more lmao.

5

Anonymous #4 6d

These people are, once again, so stupid.

6

Anonymous #4 6d

Great. If the Harper is screaming loud enough, long enough, enough times, maybe it’ll be true!

-1

Anonymous #4 6d

You’ve declared your victory, yet you’ve done nothing to refute my argument.

-1

Anonymous OP 6d

No matter how loud the dumbass denies it, the genocide is still happening

4

Anonymous #4 6d

You’ve done nothing to refute our’s. You’ve denied and denied, hid it behind flowery language, but when met with facts, you just say Nuh uh. Until you can illustrate to us all that this isn’t a genocide, you’ve lost.

4

Anonymous #4 6d

Inb4 the dumbass cries about burden of proof on social media

4

Anonymous #2 6d

Not an argument. If you harpy be loud enough, you just might be right, or you’re still not and you’re screaming in the wind.

-1

Anonymous #2 6d

This really just is people doing what they’re accusing others of, isn’t it?

-1

Anonymous OP 6d

It’s not might. I am right.

6

Anonymous OP 6d

Today yikyak seems to be genocide deniers lying about Israel sadly

-2

Anonymous #4 6d

Number four, on the part about me being at the tribunal, Oh, I will. I would do much to aid & abett, almost anyone to put him behind bars.

0

Anonymous OP 6d

You’ll be in the same cell. You are the same as him. You both deny genocide. You both love the slaughter of innocent people.

6

Anonymous #2 6d

Hopefully it won’t be sharing the same cell. It’ll be facing the same wall.

3

Anonymous #2 6d

I’ve engaged with two pieces of evidence with all you harpies, stop, screaming into the wind, and make an argument. Not propaganda, not talking points, argument. Please review the philosophical definition of an argument.

-1

Anonymous OP 6d

If you have to resort to this, you’ve lost the argument.

3

Anonymous #2 6d

He’s trying to break the record for most Ls collected in one day on yikyak

5

Anonymous #4 6d

Number four, one conflicting genocide with Judaism, the two are intertwined. How do you open the history book and looked at the years between 1920 and 1950 you would have seen that. That does not however, mean that the Jews are committing and genocide, rather, one was perpetrated, at least an attempt against them.They may fight back.

-1

Anonymous #4 6d

Keep screeching windward

0

Anonymous OP 6d

OP, you deny a genocide and reality. Seek help and read history books.

3

Anonymous #4 6d

No, again, I cannot justify something that does not exist. I can explain the circumstances of a war in sympathize with the opposition to one. I am not arguing with or against something that was factually disproven 13 conversations ago multiple times over each one. I can merely correct the incorrect.

-1

Anonymous #2 6d

Oh yes, insults disapprove reality.

-1

Anonymous OP 6d

You should correct yourself then cause all you’ve been is incorrect

4

Anonymous #4 6d

Number four, no how burden of proof works

0

Anonymous #4 6d

Number four, you can call me names haven’t ruined anything happening, I’ve now responded to three articles of evidence with 10 of my own.

0

Anonymous OP 6d

Public forum little bro. We already know it’s a genocide, you need to prove us wrongZ

6

Anonymous #4 6d

I have burn proof works please review philosophical definition of argument. I have made several arguments and articulated 10 pieces of evidence per three on this entire app. Happy to have an interesting conversation.

-1

Anonymous OP 6d

That’s funny I’ve seen 0 evidence and a bunch of cop outs and excuses as to why you won’t answer

3

Anonymous #2 6d

Yes, I invited argument not vampires

-1

Anonymous OP 6d

#2 is right. We already know the truth. If you can’t show us any evidence that it isn’t a genocide, you’ve lost the argument on here.

4

Anonymous #2 6d

Not what I articulated, no, you’re not

-1

Anonymous OP 6d

We don’t wanna suck you lil bro 🥀

5

Anonymous #4 6d

I started on this app, asking for proof that it was, and was told. I have to prove against that. It is, how proof works, not how our initiation works, please review previous comments about philosophical argument, definition, and burden of proof.

-3

Anonymous OP 6d

Please review the facts that you are Wrong Stupid Have no arguments or evidence

3

Anonymous OP 6d

This isn’t the classroom, the burden is on you.

5

Anonymous #3 6d

Never did ask

-1

Anonymous OP 6d

ohhhhhhh and the zionist is using the same justifications the colonists did in what’s now the US makes sense

7

Anonymous #6 6d

Please enlighten me #6, what is this justification

-1

Anonymous OP 6d

“if barbarians take them” this is the EXACT wording european scholars used to justify their colonialism. Look up the theory of unilineal cultural evolution i refuse to argue with an apartheid-supporting antisemetic freak like you

8

Anonymous #6 6d

There is no take nor is there an if. 2000+ were taken. Luckily, to the point about the Europeans in North America, American exceptionalism was able to free half of that land from what would otherwise be British America. Now only a little over half of North America is Canadian, the other half is free and American. Worry not, colonialism was avoided.

-1

Anonymous OP 5d

you know i was quoting you right?

3

Anonymous #6 5d

In what way

0

Anonymous OP 5d

You’re a zionist… you literally are the unitary given flesh.

4

Anonymous #7 5d

Is the unitary given flesh?

0

Anonymous OP 3d

the only time the words if or take were said (which you based your whole point off of) was a quote taken directly from your comment

0

Anonymous #6 3d

wtf R U talking abt

0

Anonymous #7 3d

wtf is “The unitary given flesh”

1

Anonymous OP 3d

u gotta be intentionally dense dude i cannot put it in simpler terms 🤦‍♀️

1

Anonymous #6 3d

You haven’t put it in any terms

0

Anonymous #2 3d

Luckily “objective reality” says there isn’t any genocide of 🇵🇸

-3

Anonymous OP 3d

I gave your mom an objective reality last night

1