
I object to that. Racial sensitivity training was part of my learning module, and if you look through my post history, I’ve celebrated Africans multiple times. As far as propaganda, I don’t deny that we’re a right-leaning org, we act as a necessary counterweight in an overwhelmingly left-wing media environment. That said, we don’t blindly follow this administration, and will critique it if necessary.
tokenizing people of a certain race isn’t exactly the defense you think it is, especially when it’s in defense of a white supremacist organization who has repeatedly and actively regurgitates propaganda in favor of white supremacy every. single. day. this entire country is right-wing, shut the fuck up. democrats, are right wing. you’re not counterbalancing shit, you’re further radicalizing the population into far-right extremism, being ultra-nationalism, militarism, and authoritarianism.
if you’re so willing to critique the administration, go ahead. let’s hear your opinion on trump being found liable in the case of sexually assaulting Jean Carrol; or your perspective on the thousands of court rulings that trump has explicitly violated and ignored; or politicization of FEMA and refusal to allocate funds as needed, instead only giving them to red states? That’s just the tip of the iceberg. or would that put your internship at risk?🤭
Exceptions disprove rules, that is how science works, and political science is no different. The stories you mentioned are from before the start of my internship, so I’m not going to comment on them. If you want me to list a critique the current administration, it could have done more to prevent disease outbreaks like cyclosporiasis, although I will note the HHS Secretary is a Democrat.
that is explicitly not how science works, hence why statistics takes outliers into accounts. A singular outlier does not disprove a study, especially for the scientific method; you wouldn’t know that though, as it seems you’ve never taken a STEM class in your life otherwise you would’ve been taught that. science is based on repeatable, testable, observations. an outlier is exactly that: an outlier.
“stories” you’re not slick. you could absolutely comment on his sexual assault of Jean Carrol, as the Supreme Court refusing to hear the appeal happened just this month, in which if you’re a summer intern it happened during your internship. unless of course, you’re lying to avoid having to either 1. Acknowledge or share and statements that can be perceived as disparaging to the president; or 2. Acknowledge that Fox is indeed a far-right propaganda organization.
Additionally, RFK jr. is not a Democrat, he’s an independent, who was explicitly appointed by trump and who works closely with the administration; in which the recent outbreaks of cyclosporiasis is a result of the administrations reversals of HHS monitoring programs early in the 2nd administration. It’s weird how you lied to try to shift blame onto democrats, when it’s entirely the fault of the Republican administration. yet you’re not a propaganda organization?