Anonymous #1 1w

“I’ll bring a child into suffering and further punish the planet because MAYBE there’s a small chance things get better”

0

Anonymous OP 1w

You miss all the shots you don't take

0

Anonymous og_beer 1w

Hell yeah

5

Anonymous #1 1w

So you’re choosing to bring someone into life without their consent into a painful world bc “they could make it better”?

0

Anonymous #3 1w

I thought that they were just a clump of cells inside the woman's body?

1

Anonymous #1 1w

they are at first yes, but when they’re born they’re a person, I’m assuming we’re not talking abortion here Before birth imo you can do whatever tf you want, it’s the woman’s body, you can always try to conceive again, it takes decades to replace grown women

0

Anonymous #3 1w

So why do I need to get the consent from a clump of cells for them to exist?

1

Anonymous #1 1w

bc if you carry the fetus to term it becomes a person, and people have basic innate rights

0

Anonymous #3 1w

Did your parents talk to you in the womb and ask you for your consent?

1

Anonymous #1 1w

nope, it’s not realistically feasible, fetuses and even newborns can’t communicate I think the stronger argument is that there’s thousands if not millions of children globally that need adoptive parents, if you need a child, why not get one that already exists and needs parents?

0

Anonymous #3 1w

I don't want someone else's child either, part of the reason is that I'm doing it to extend my bloodline

1

Anonymous #1 1w

why wouldn’t an adoptive child extend your family line? they share your last name, you raise them, is there any reasonable difference if they’re related to you or not?

0

Anonymous #3 1w

I said bloodline not family line

1

Anonymous #1 1w

why is bloodline important to you? and also, how do you know your bloodline doesn’t have adoptions within it?

0

Anonymous #3 1w

I haven't donated to that many sperm banks yet plus I don't think I would be allowed to raise them anyways

1