Sidechat logo Sidechat
Download TikTok Instagram X

Explore

Find communities with your people

  • oddly satisfying
    oddly satisfying 1406 members
  • Marvel
    Marvel 136044 members
  • Heartstopper 🍂
    Heartstopper 🍂 1734 members
  • forbidden foods
    forbidden foods 1489 members
  • NBA
    NBA 223280 members
  • Down Bad Sluts
    Down Bad Sluts 11145 members
  • math nerds
    math nerds 1561 members
  • Snapchat
    Snapchat 1968 members
  • MASSHOLES
    MASSHOLES 1689 members
  • Embarrassing Moments That Keep You Up
    Embarrassing Moments That Keep You Up 117455 members
  • General
    General 318676 members
  • Black Cat Lovers 🐈‍⬛🌙
    Black Cat Lovers 🐈‍⬛🌙 11607 members
  • K-Drama
    K-Drama 13182 members
  • Philly
    Philly 1598 members
  • Free Samples and Stuff
    Free Samples and Stuff 1655 members
  • Furries
    Furries 1832 members
  • holiday gifts
    holiday gifts 15153 members
  • SpongeBob
    SpongeBob 11633 members
  • DEBRIEF
    DEBRIEF 137007 members
  • Pokemon
    Pokemon 117125 members
  • Rizzle Me This
    Rizzle Me This 1751 members
  • OCD
    OCD 1945 members
  • UTK Greek Life
    UTK Greek Life 1663 members
  • Slut Support
    Slut Support 13586 members
  • Jewish
    Jewish 1682 members
  • Harry Potter⚡
    Harry Potter⚡ 11318 members
  • Low Quality Images
    Low Quality Images 1931 members
  • tea
    tea 1701 members
  • Nutrition
    Nutrition 1730 members
  • Women Feet Appreciation
    Women Feet Appreciation 1503 members
See more
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
US Politics icon
US Politics 15w
.gov was already paying 83% of Obamacare enrollees’ costs before the enhanced subsidies kicked in. Why not let them keep it? In fact, why didn’t they make the enhancements permanent in the original law?
8 upvotes. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. ".gov was already paying 83% of Obamacare enrollees’ costs before the enhanced subsidies kicked in. Why not let them keep it? In fact, why didn’t they make the enhancements permanent in the original law?"
comment
upvote 8 downvote

No comments