Anonymous #3 1w

You make a pretty good point, but I CAN think of a few things it would change, like for example if this was a MASS shooter then the amount of rounds they can fire would play a difference. Granted mass shootings are a bit more rare, but not rare enough. So I see that as a rare but significant downside with very little upside.

1

To be honest it’s not drums I’m referring to, more the larger 40 or 50 round magazines.

1

Anonymous #5 1w

You think having 10 extra bullets is gonna do you any good against the government’s soldiers?…

1

Anonymous #4 1w

Seems like you’re compensating for bad aim

0

Anonymous OP 1w

no bud 1000 will

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Huh?

0

Anonymous #5 1w

*but

1

Anonymous #5 1w

Assuming you hit every target I guess. Just doesn’t seem too practical even in your hypothetical situation where the government REALLY wants to kill you

1

Anonymous OP 1w

I think if someone is very determined in their attack they will spend some time training to reload quickly under pressure, and they will still get many rounds off regardless. Or they’ll just use multiple guns to avoid this as long as possible. But I do see your point I personally am not opposed to magazine bans above 30 rounds since they’re stupid even in a tactical sense. They jam easily and are cumbersome

1

Anonymous #3 1w

I can get behind that last point, if it would be a reasonable compromise at least.

1