The issue is, youâre speaking in the hypothetical of a cis man becoming a trans women for the SOLE PURPOSE of harassing women, that doesnât happen. Cis men, presenting as cis men, and assaulting women, Like Larry Nassar, has happened, and will continue to happen, attacking trans people with fear mongering hypotheticals doesnât âhelp womenâ
Dude. My question is not âwhat if your rapist was trans.â It is: âDo you put trans women in female-only prisons?â Donât attack the question. Answer it. Like you getting offended doesnât address the problem the question centers on⊠And âfreakâ? Come on. You sound like a Trump supporter.
Sure. Maybe itâs a hypothetical case that will never happen (ie maybe no trans-women who have committed violent crimes will ever go to prison). But it sounds possible to me. Call it fear-mongering, but you better hope it never happens or someone is going to answer the question, and someone is going to be mad or get hurt.
Iâm talking about public prison, almost all of which are divided by sex. 8% of prisons are private. Letâs ignore those for argument sake. 93% of prisoners are male. Only 7% are female. See above. I. Never. Said. âMen [who] transition to have sexual access.â I am only talking about women who had already transitioned before committing violent crimes. Ie you have a biological man who transitioned at a young age to become a woman. She commits violent crimes. Do you put her in a womanâs prison?
Like dude. You are INCAPABLE of answering a question which is honestly important. In this context, you donât care about trans women since the state will choose which prison to put people in based on biological sex in the majority of cases. Refusing to answer the question and calling it bad faith just lets other people answer the question. Ie the price of getting offended is having NO ARGUMENT. Hope this helps.