Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
US Politics icon
US Politics 22h
Why do people keep saying Trump is a “Pedophile”? There’s 0 evidence, 0 charges — just dropped claims that can’t be verified If Leftists want to be seen as the “party of facts and science,”they should stop spreading blatantly False Information
-13 upvote, 34 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "Why do people keep saying Trump is a “Pedophile”? There’s 0 evidence, 0 charges — just dropped claims that can’t be verified If Leftists want to be seen as the “party of facts and science,”they should stop spreading blatantly False Information"
comment

34
upvote -13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 22h

Forever glad I’m not someone who spoonfeeds myself grok propaganda

upvote 42 downvote
🎧
Anonymous 22h

He’s literally on video telling a little girl how bad he wants to date her. How are you going to take the word of a Brain Melting Fuckup Generator over his own word when he tells the world that he’s a pedophile?

upvote 29 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 22h

Your capitalization patterns are very strange

upvote 24 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 22h

Hey it’s Elon Peterson come to punish our timeline yet again

upvote 16 downvote
🐇
Anonymous 21h

Hey OP, I have a question for you

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 21h

You worship a serial rapist pedophile. I look forward to the true crime podcasts about you.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 21h

You using state-run AI to 'prove' your points is sending me 😭😂

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 22h

Knowingly spreading Fake Information is exactly what Anti-Vaccine people do Leftists should not criticize these people, while at the same time using the same tactics — it lacks integrity… 🙃

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 22h

Well, do you have any Credible Evidence? Stop blaming the messenger — the Reality is the same Use whatever word you want: No proven, no substantiated, no credible evidence

post
upvote -11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> amethyst_headphone51 22h

Do you understand the principle of credible evidence? Substantiated, Credible, Proven evidence. If not, you are as bad as the Anti-Vaccine people. In SCIENCE, evidence is peer-reviewed publication is a reputable journal. In LAW, we go based on the legal system and innocence until proven guilty.

upvote -11 downvote
🎧
Anonymous replying to -> OP 22h

An unprompted, public confession is credible evidence you stupid fuck. And I’m a 2nd year law student who’s done legal work in two countries and refuted legal scholars in a public debate. Don’t try to tell me how the law works, I know more now than you ever will.

upvote 31 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> amethyst_headphone51 22h

Gah dang

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> amethyst_headphone51 22h

Any corroboration? If the evidence is so strong, why don’t you charge Trump yourself then? Genuine question ^

upvote -9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> amethyst_headphone51 22h

You refuted them in legal debate… uhh… so you had a convo?

upvote -9 downvote
🎧
Anonymous replying to -> OP 22h

1) Because publicly admitting that you’re a pedophile and saying creepy things to kids isn’t a criminal offense. That’s what I personally possess evidence of. 2) Because I’m not a prosecutor goofball. I legally do not have the authority to bring charges against anyone, no matter what evidence I have. Do you want to tell me more about the criminal legal system again?

upvote 20 downvote
🎧
Anonymous replying to -> OP 22h

No, it was at a formal debate hosted by my school’s Federalist Society chapter.

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> amethyst_headphone51 22h

If ur refuting federalist society folks then you probably know ur stuff

upvote 24 downvote
🎧
Anonymous replying to -> #2 22h

That particular exchange was really narrow in scope and Prof. Wurman had taken on a pretty indefensible proposition. I think most of my colleagues would have caught him in the same lie, I was just quick on my feet that day lol. Dude tried to argue the Citizenship Clause only protects those who’s parents can bring suit in fed court (and then fucked up that analysis) but his test would have left Dred Scott intact so it’s obviously bunk.

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> amethyst_headphone51 22h

Okay, so he made some creepy remarks. Well, Trump says dumb stuff all the time, about any topic. Basically, you admit there’s no substantiated, credible evidence he is the legal definition of a Pedophile.

upvote -6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 22h

That’s not what he admitted at all. I know you only learn from Elon and Jordan Peterson, but that is not an excuse to argue in bad faith

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 21h

For the last time: any Credible, Substantiated, EVIDENCE??

upvote -6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 21h

He presented it quite well. Not my fault you’re disingenuous and/or blind

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 21h

Great. So to summarize, 0 evidence. Since you have nothing to add, have a nice day 👍

post
upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 21h

all republicans do is lie

post
upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 21h

it’s insane how much of a scumbag you are which is it, are you actively deluding yourself to justify your arrogant support for trump? Or are you explicitly supporting him despite his pedophilia and abuses while willingly running propaganda in favor of him?

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 21h

Any evidence? I don’t support pedophilia

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 21h

“Serial rapist pedophile” Evidence?

upvote -3 downvote
🐇
Anonymous replying to -> bigchungusgaysex 21h

No answer…..so much for the tolerant right.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> bigchungusgaysex 21h

He’s scared of bigchungusgaysex

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 21h

Jury verdict. His own recorded voice. Next?

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 21h

so deluding yourself?

upvote 6 downvote
🎧
Anonymous replying to -> OP 21h

You’re defending a pedophile who admits he’s a pedophile. So yeah, you do actually. Actions speak louder.

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 19h

a pedophile is someone who is attracted to children… he literally expressed sexual attraction to children.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 18h

There’s a difference between meeting the legal standard for criminal culpability, and having enough evidence that a reasonable person would infer you’re guilty. Donald Trump is in that second category. Is it illegal to buy a beauty pageant for teenagers? No, but it’s fucking weird. Is it illegal to be close friends with an infamous pedophile? No, but it’s going to earn you some allegations.

upvote 6 downvote