Anonymous #4 5w

I’ll stop when the right wing stops committing a statistically disproportionate amount of political violence. Until then, I’m going to assume anything that looks like political violence is probably them.

-1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

But I feel like you’d be someone on here getting upset when someone points fingers at or makes assumptions towards liberals committing violence. Your way of thinking is pretty narrow-minded and counterproductive. It kinda is more so an issue of not speaking so confidently without any evidence to back it up.

1

Anonymous #4 5w

Liberals don’t commit a disproportionate amount of political violence. So that wouldn’t make very much sense.

-1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

Again, I’m saying that pointing fingers without any proof specific to this situation is just causing more problems. It’s stoking a fire that doesn’t need to be stoked. I feel like you’d haven’t learned anything from the past month or so.

5

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

“I’ll stop spreading misinformation when the political opposition stops doing things I can spread misinformation about” Listen to yourself for 3 seconds and realize how insane you sound rn fam

0

Anonymous #4 5w

*judge rules against fascist* *begins to receive constant death threats after the fact* *home almost immediately goes up in flames* Forgive me for making the obvious connection here lmao.

0

Anonymous og_beer 5w

This goes to you too.

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

It’s not obvious, it’s a possibility, yes. But not “the obvious answer”. Especially since there’s a lot of info being released that points to the opposite being true

0

Anonymous og_beer 5w

Such as?

-1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

There’s a difference between “oh I think it could be arson” and “it’s obviously arson anything else is a cover up and I don’t care how much information you tell me otherwise it’s only arson”. Guess which one you’re doing rn

1

Anonymous og_beer 5w

Such as?

-1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

1. Extremely isolated gated community 2. There were 5 adults home, and security cameras, and she wasn’t even in the house. 3. It’s an older home in a flood zone. Electrical fires and faulty wiring exist, especially with water damage 4. Arsons stay and watch. Wouldn’t security cameras, neighbors, or the 4 other people have seen them? Or her since she was OUTSIDE at the time? 5. Someone else said, she was a heavy smoker. Cigarettes cause over 7k house fires a year

3

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

Oh and SLED, the state law enforcement agency, released they have yet to find evidence of arson

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

I also take issue with the downplaying of ICE related violence that you make in your initial post. It’s just ironic that there are serious instances of violence and malice there and you are kinda quick to make light of it, yet a house fire occurs with currently no proof of arson and it’s all signs pointing to political violence…

0

Anonymous og_beer 5w

Still fishy and none of that procludes arson. Going with my gut. If there’s any more damning evidence that it wasn’t arson I’m happy to make a correction.

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

your gut is fucking wrong. Stop spreading misinformation

4

Anonymous og_beer 5w

Sorry dude. Sticking with it.

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

Sure but what we are saying is it shouldn’t be about “making a correction” it’s more so not making bold claims BEFORE the facts come out. Does that make sense? We are saying to stop pointing fingers without facts. That’s it.

1

Anonymous #4 5w

“You need to take violence against ICE more seriously it’s not a joke.”

0

Anonymous #4 5w

You make assumptions, you post it on an online forum, it riles somebody up, and the cycle repeats.

3

Anonymous #4 5w

You could break the cycle right now by shutting up.

-1

Anonymous #4 5w

You’re the guy getting riled up. If you think this post is wrong, okay. That’s fine. Maybe in the future I’ll agree, maybe I’ll be vindicated. We done now.

-1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

You’re a literal moron rn. You don’t win just because you stop listening to the people who have you evidence you’re wrong

4

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

You rn

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

I’m not the one making baseless assumptions. Just like the other commentator I’m using the facts that have been presented by investigators. I’ve seen this headline posted atleast a dozen times in this forum with the same vague finger pointing. Those are the people who could stop the cycle.

3

Anonymous og_beer 5w

I’m only leaving because I’m feeling the urge to be mean, and I like you beer.

-1

Anonymous og_beer 5w

Like I said before, you could be right. Maybe it’s not arson. I’m convinced it was tho. If stronger evidence comes out proving it wasn’t, which I understand is an unfair standard, then I’ll change my mind. But it quacks like a duck man.

-1

Anonymous #4 5w

Aight aight aight aight, finish typing that shit and I see sixteen more fuckin replies. I’m just gonna dip.

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

Stronger evidence is the officials who are investigating the fire have said there is no evidence it was intentional. None. And for the record your analogy breaks down because many things quack like ducks. Including wood frogs, minke whales, fishing cats, and crows! You are actively being a bad person, and a dangerous person, for turning your eyes away from evidence that doesn’t support your claims because “your gut” says otherwise

5

Anonymous og_beer 5w

I need to start jumping down your throat every time you say something I think is dumb.

-1

Anonymous og_beer 5w

Like I said. We will see as more evidence comes out.

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

Sure go for it I guess. But I don’t think this is dumb, I’m saying it’s actively dangerous. What’s dumb is you thinking spreading misinformation is ok

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

Your opinion gets challenged with facts and you respond by saying you “feel the urge to be mean”…??? We are having a discussion in a discussion forum and you wanna devolve into insults and being mean? Crazy.

1

Anonymous og_beer 5w

Exactly. Again, it’s stoking a fire that doesn’t need to be stoked right now. If you have a problem with people on the other side doing it, don’t do it yourself.

1

Anonymous #4 5w

“You’re a dumb dangerous asshole” “I’m feeling the urge to be mean so I’m gonna leave” “YOU HAVE THE URGE TO BE MEAN WHEN CONFRONTED WITH FACTS?” No man. I’ll be mean to you all day I don’t give a shit. But I have preexisting relationship with OG beer, and even if I think they’re being an unbearable piece of shit who I’m certain is going to be proven wrong, I don’t want to create any unnecessary conflict with a person I otherwise like.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

What is this conversation you’re having with yourself? I never said that first quote so idk why it’s directed at me. Also throwing in “I’m certain they’re gonna be proven wrong” kinda just puts you back at square one.

1

Anonymous #4 5w

Unless you mean the “you’re a dumb dangerous asshole” quote, in which case think it should be obvious I don’t literally think you said that. That was actually more geared towards beer anyway. I don’t really like or care about your opinion the way I do theirs.

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

I mean sure but beer and I are quite literally saying the same thing and supporting the same side of the coin sooo 🤨

1