Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download

discotheque

Idk the whole debate was literally “we have the same policies except im a two stater and you’re a one stater (idk the technical term for not a two state solution idfk)” and “im into Medicare for all and you’re into single payer”
well........... ive been seeing some haley stevens clips post debate and shes just straight up saying "yea im trying to win but i have no idea what i can do if i win" and just lying about her campaign funding sources
6 upvotes. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "well...........

ive been seeing some haley stevens clips post debate and shes just straight up saying "yea im trying to win but i have no idea what i can do if i win" and just lying about her campaign funding sources"
upvote 2 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

There’s a pretty significant difference between a candidate dedicated to funneling money to a foreign country to fund their infrastructure and ongoing genocidal violence and a candidate who wants to help implement a fully subsidized healthcare system, though. The bigger issue is that Stevens has been bought out and will not answer to people’s interests (similar to Schumer or Jeffries).

upvote 9 downvote
💿
Anonymous 8w

Sorry by single payer I mean public option

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 8w

Most Democratic policies will probably be similar in some form or another, but the surging progressive wing of the party is focused on subsidizing essential services like healthcare and education. That alone would make a world of a difference for most Americans.

upvote 6 downvote