Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

Meh the Israel lobby has both parties by the balls and pushed for both invasions. I don’t think Kamala Harris’s foreign policy (mind you, this woman was endorsed by Liz Cheney) wouldn’t have been hawkish

1

Anonymous xi.jinping 1w

Israel is an important ally and we definitely scratch each others backs but they don’t control America, even if we do them favors in return for helping us do our dirty work. I agree that we likely would’ve seen endorsement of genocide in Gaza just like we had under Biden but we would not be blowing up schools and fishermen and kidnapping leaders of sovereign nations. The fact that both choices are horrible doesn’t negate the fact that these horrendous foreign policy decisions could be avoided

1

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

^that *some of them could be avoided. And that’s extremely important to the people who’s lives have been/ will be destroyed by those policies

1

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

What I mean is, AIPAC has funded the campaigns of most sitting federal representatives, so they’re likely to be willing to do their donors’ dirty work

1

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

Harris probably would have been a little less overt about it and probably wouldn’t have gotten as much media coverage, and might not have assassinated fishermen, but I don’t see how she would have done anything to prevent invasions and damage to Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, etc.

1

Anonymous xi.jinping 1w

What makes you think she would’ve invaded Venezuela or Cuba simply because trump has/might?

1

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

And I agree that the Israeli lobby is strong regardless of party but strikes under Harris would’ve at least been done with more attention to international law which is important. The trump admin immediately dissolved the civilian protection center of excellence which was created to avoid the exact sort of thing as what happened to the Iranian girls school. Someone slightly less monstrous than hegseth would be a meaningful improvement to people on the ground

1